# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0267
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0267?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 195, page id 727097563:0267
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=267
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000267.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine
# Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

the Doctrine of the Prinier.
Buc althoueh Noetus vas condemnec
Com
enE.
vet this Doctrine did spread inthe Faltern in Matct.
Parts; For Orieen mentions thole Who con- P. 470.
founded the Notion of Father and Son, and
made them but one TEypostasis, and distin-
suised onty by thoueht, and Denomination.
This Doctrine was oppoled not onty by
Oricen, but he had the sense ofthe Church
concurrins with hum, a5 appears in thc
Case ot Berrius Bilhop oF Bostra, Who feil
into this Opinion, and ras reclaimed by
Orizen; and Ensebius sives chis accoune
OF it. That there vas a Concurrence of 0. Fuleb. l. 6.
thers vith him in it, and chac this D0- 5. 33.
ctrine Wras lookd on as an Innovation in
the Faith. For his Opinion as that oux
Saviour had no proper Subsistence of his oon
before the Incarnation; and that the Deity
of the Father alone vas in him. Hc did
noc mean that the son had no separate Di
vinier from cheFather, but thacthe Deitr
OF the Facher only appeared in the Son;
(0 chat he ras not really crod, but ontv
onc in whom the Dciey ot the Pather
vas made manifest. Which Was one of
the oldest Herelies in the Church, and the
most carty condemned and opvoled by
to
But chole Herekes, Which betore hac
disterenced Perlons tromthe Church, Were
nOv