# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0269 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0269?run=74 # Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40) # Folio 197, page id 727097563:0269 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=269 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000269.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 34 lines, status machine # Lines: 34 recognised, mean confidence 0.91 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. the Doctrine of the Prinier. sires an accoune in his RpiAtle to Xrstus FuIED. L. 7. then Bishop ot Rome, Wherein he talces notice of the wicked and blasphemous FTe- resce, lately broached there acainst the Per– sons of the Father, Son and TToly Chost. Letters on both sidesere brouehu tohim, on wrhich occalion he irrote several lxi- Ales, amons whuchthere as one to immo- nius Bistrop ot Bernice, another ot theci- ties ot Pentapolis. In chis, he disputed wich srear warmth asainst this Doctrinc Ot Sabellius, inlomuchu, thache was after- rards accused to Dionysius ot Rome, that he had sone too tar the octer way; and Jessen d the Divinier ot the son by his Similitudes; of wrhrich heclear dhimselt. 25 apDearS by What remains oF his De- tence in Athanasius. But a5 to his ZCal acainst Sabellianism it wasnever queltiord. Dionysius ot Rome deciares his Senle at laree in ehis macter asainst boch fx tremes, viz. Ot thole who alterted threc separate and independent Principles, and Ot thole who confounded the Divine Per- 6. 6. 26. Actan. de sons; and he charses theDoctrinc ot Sa- Decret. bellius too With Blasphemy, as WWell asthose synodi Wrhro set up three different Principles, and Nicanae so made threc Cods. But he declares the Christian Doctrine to De, thac there ivere Father, Son and oly 6bost; but that there 1. 275.