# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0274
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0274?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 202, page id 727097563:0274
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=274
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000274.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication of
ould fain have charged this Doxoloe a5
an Innoration on S. Basil, becaule it at-
tribured equal FIonour t0 F’ather, Son and
loly Ghost Wtrieh the Aerians would nOr
endure; but ther Caid, That the Son vas
10 be honoured ont in Subordination t0 the
Father, and the LToly Chost as inferrour t0
borh. But S. Basit proves trom Scrixture
an Pquality of FJonour to be due tothem:
and parricularis trom the Form of Bap-
rism, c. 10. Wherein rhe Son and FToly Chost
are jorned with the Father, oithout any
note of Distinction. And vohat more pro-
per token of a Conjunction in the same Dic-
nity, than beine put rocether in such a
manner.
ESpecially considerins thele trro things.
T. The extream scaloulie ot the sewittr
Nation, 25to jornins the Creatures with
Cod in ony chine that relared to Divine
HIOnour. But a5S. Basit areues, IF the Son
ivere a Creature, then ve must believe in
rhe Creator, and the Creature tocether: and
By the same reason that one Creature isjoyn-
ed the whole Creation may be joyned voith
him; but laith he, ve are not to imarine
the least Disunion or Separation between l’a-
ther, Son and TToly Ghost; nor that they are
three distinet parts of one inseparable Beine.
but that there is an indivisible Conjunction
O
2