# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0283
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0283?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 211, page id 727097563:0283
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=283
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000283.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

the Doctrine of the Priniey.
Chost. And that he spake ot them as oF
distinet Persons, 25 appears bY his vords
alterwards. They Woho take the Son 10 be P. 26.
the Father, neither tenou the l’ather nor
theSon, oho beine the Word and sirst be-
eotten is 6od. And when he speals of ehe
Fucharist, he Caith, That it is offer d +0 P. 97.
the Farher of all, by the Name of the Son,
and the TToly Ghost: and ot other solemn
ACES et Devotion, he Paith, That in alt
of them they praise C0d the Father of alt, P. 98.
by his Son Fesus Christ, and the ZToly Chost.
And in ocher places, he mentions the
Worthip chey sive to Pather, Son and
FToly Ghost. Indeed he mentions a disse-
P. 56.
rence of Order betreen them; but makes P. 60.
no Difference 25 tothe WVorship siven to
them. And aII this in nO lOnS ApoloZY
For the Christian Faith. What can bethe
meanine of this, il he did noc talce ie
For granied, that the Christian Church
embraced che Doctrine of the Trinity in
Baprism: Fustin Marryr was nosucli Wcate
Man t0 00 about to expose the Christian
Relision instend ot detendine it; and he
must have done Io, il he did not believe
this not onty eo bc a true, but a necessa-
ry pare of the Christian FaicH. FOr, WVhy
did he ac all mention such a MysterioUS
aud dart Poinc: Why didhenorconceal it,
d