# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0289 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0289?run=74 # Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40) # Folio 217, page id 727097563:0289 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=289 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000289.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine # Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.90 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. ihe Doctrine of the Frinier. Oracles, or any doubetul Authoricies; buF Plutarch de IIId. 8 Plutarch aleres the three TErpostases 10 Osirid. p have been receir d amone the Perlians, and 369. ed. Porphyry, and famblicus, lay the lame ol Eusebius the Ferprians. PraD.L 4. Thacrhis TErpostasis did maincain its. 3. C. TT. Samb. de Reputation (o lone in the Worid. FOr WVC MyA. Sect. Aind it continued to the time ot Macrobius. 8. c. 2. MacrOB. in Wtio mentions it 25 a realonable NOtion, Som: Siei Viz. OF one supreme Being. Father of alb, Dion. l. 1. and a Mind proceedine from it, and Sont c. 14 frem Mind. Some have thouohethat the Platonilts made tuo created Beines, 10 be rvo of the Divine FCypostases; buc rhis is contrars to what Plotinus and Porphyrr attum concernine it, and ic is hard to gire an Account, hon ther Mould then De Fssentialr ditterent trom Crearures, andDe TIrpostases in the Divine PPence, Buc this is no part ot my bulinels, being concerned no Farther, chan to clearthe Sense ot the Christion Church, a5 t0 the Form of Baprism in the Name of the Fa- ther. Son and FToly Ghost; Which accor- dins to the Sense oF ihe Ante. Nicene l’a- thers, Ihare proved, doch manifest che Doctrine of the Trinity, to have been Generally receird in che Chrictian Churet. 2. Let