# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0294 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0294?run=74 # Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40) # Folio 222, page id 727097563:0294 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=294 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000294.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine # Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. A Vindication of into that Religion which proceeds fromGod the Facher, and deliver d By his Son, and confirmed by the Testimony of the TToly Chost. So much we grancis implicd, Due Ehe Quection Aill remains, Wwhether the Son and Foly Chost are tiere to be consi- der d onty in order to their Operations, or Whecher che Perlons oFche son and FToly Ghost. Erom Whom chole FHeCts Came, are not here chiesy intended: Por il no more had been meane, buc thele ERectS, then cherishe Form of admistion had noc been, into the Name of Father, Son and FToly Chost; but in the Name of the Father alone, 25 Revealine him(elF by his Son, and Consirmine it by che miraculous NV ortes oF ehc LToly Ghost. For chele are only sub. servient ACS to che detion oF God the Fa- ther, as the only subsistine Person. 5. They ceII uS, That it is in vain, not 10 say ridiculousty pretended, that a Per- son or Thine is God because ve are baptized into it; for some vere baptize d into Moles, and others into Johrs Baprism, and so Moles and Tohn Baptist would beCods; and +0 be baptized into a Person or Persons, and in the name of such a Person is the same thine. Crrant chis; vet chere is a great difierence betveen beins baptized in che name oF a Minister of Baprism, and ot the Author