# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0304 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0304?run=74 # Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40) # Folio 232, page id 727097563:0304 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=304 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000304.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine # Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.93 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. A Vindication of ous Ideas, or Perceptions of thines; of affirm- ins. or denyins accordine as he sees them to acree or disarree, and this is Reason in General. It is not the bare recervine Ideas into the Mind, that is strictly Reason, (rrhro everthoushe ic WaS:) but the Per- ception of the Arreement, or Disacreement of our Ideas in acreater or lesser Number; Wherein soever this dereement or Disa- preement may consist. If the Perception be immediate without the assistance of any o- ther Idea, this is not cau d Reason, but Self.Fividence: but When the mind makes use of intermediate Ideas to discover that Agreement or Disarreement, this method of Rnouledce is properly cau d Reason or Demonstration. And so Reason is defined e0 be that l’aculty of the Soul, Which dis- covers the certainty of any thine dubious, or obseure by comparinq it vith somethine evidently knoion. This is ofterd eo the Worlo, a5 an AC. conne of Realon; but to Mer how very loole, and unsatistactory it is, I detire it may beconliderd, that this Doctrine sup. Poles, chat re must have clear and di- sinct Ideas oF erhaterer We pretend 10 2. ny cerrainty ot in our Minds, and thaco che only Way to accam chis certainty, 15 by comparins chele ideas togecher. Whicl excliides