# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0307
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0307?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 235, page id 727097563:0307
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=307
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000307.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

the Doetrine of the Trinier.
it, only an uncertain supposition of ve tnou
not hat. And cheretore it is paralleld,
more chan once, with the Indian Philo- L. 2. c. 13.
Sophers, Fle tenew not mhat; Wbich suppor- Sect. 19.
ted the Fortoile, that supported the F. lC. Chap. 23.
phane, that supported the Farth; (0 Sub- sect. 2.
stance vas found our only to support Acci-
dents. And, that when we talk of Sub-
stances we talt like Children Woho beins ate d
a Duestion, about somenhat which theytenou
not, readilr sive this satisfactory Ansver,
thatit is somethine
IE chis be the cruth of the Casc, we
must Rill talk like Children, and l Unow
noc hor ic can be remedied. For, il WC
cannoc come ac a racional Idea Ot Sub-
stance, re con have no Principle ot cer-
camey 1050 upon in chis DCBaCC.
Ido noc (aY, chac we can have aclear
Edea of Substance, cicher by Sensation Or
Restection; bur trom hence largue, ThaE
this is a very insufficient Distribution ot
the Ideas necestary 10 ReatOn. FOr bc.
sides chele, chere must le lome senerat
Ideas, Wrhich che mind doch FOrm, HOE
Oy meer comparine those Ldeas it has sot
from sense or Refection; but by FOrmin
distinet seneral Norions, ol chines trom
particular Ideas. And amons chele se
ral Norions, or racional Ideas, Sub-
stance