# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0334
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0334?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 262, page id 727097563:0334
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=334
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000334.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

AVindication of, ec.
ture, ic mus be in a may aerceable t0
the infinice Perfections oF ir. And no
objection can be calcen trom che Idea os
Cod, to overthrow a Trinity Ot C0. exi-
stine Persons in the same Divine Psence.
For necessarr Existence doch imply a Co.
existence ot the Divine Persons; and the
Onicy oftheDirinc Essence, chattherecan-
not Deluch a ditterence ol individuat Sub-
stances, 25 chere isamons mankcind. BuE
chele chinss are laid e0 De above our Rea-
son, IE not contrary to it, and even suct
are laidto De repugnant eo our Relision.
2. Thac theretore is the nexe thine 10
Dc caresuliy Examin d, Whecher Mysteries
of Faith, Or Matters oF Revelation a-
bove our Reason, are to De rejected by 11S.
And a Thine is laid to he above our Rea-
son, Wvhen we can have no clear and distinet
Idea oF ic in cur Minas: And, that if we
haveno Tdeas of a thine. it is certaintr but
tost labour for us to rrouble our selves about
nicus not it; aDd chat, if such Doctrines be propo-
Nyst. P. 28.d Wwhich ve cannot understand, ve must
have neu Pouers, and Orsans for the Per-
ception of them.
Neare tar trom detendins contradicti
ons to our naturat Notions (OF Wrhrich I
have spoken already) buc chat Whuich we
are nom upon is, rhether any Doctrine
Ma)
Christia