# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0360
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0360?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio 288, page id 727097563:0360
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=360
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000360.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 32 lines, status machine
# Lines: 32 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

A Vindication of
Doctrine ofthe Trinity was uled as an ar-
rument to brine in Transubstantiation, 25
that is now alledsed for castins oA che
Other.
But I must do them that right 10 tell
the Worid, chat at that time a Socinian
Ansiver Was irritten eo chole Dialocues,
Wrhich Plaw, and wistrd it mighe be Prin-
ced, thac the Worid mishe be latistied
about it andchem. But cher choushE AE
t0 Forbear; and in aIl cheir laLC PaMI-
Phlers irhere this Parallet is (0 often re-
Deaced, there is bur once, that I can Anc,
any notice tatren ot thole Dialorues, and
char in a very superticial manner. POr
the main Delien and Scopeofthem is past
over, and only one particular mention d,
Which Mall be anliver d in its due order.
Dut in auliver ro the general Enquies.
I Mall endeavour to Ctate the due Bounds
Detireen Faith and Reason, and chereby
to Mer, thac by chole grounds on whrich
ve receire che Doctrine ol che Trinity
e do nor sire ay to rhe tintertainment
ol any ablurd Opinion, nor Overthron
che Certainty ot Reason.
T. We have no ditterence with them
about che 2 se ot our Reason 25tothe C er-
tainty ot a Revelation. For in this calc,
NC are a5 much 25 they, For leareAImS
inI