# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0368
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/727097563:0368?run=74
# Title: A Discourse In Vindication of the Doctrine of the Trinity (shelfmarks ZEN Leibn. Marg. 40; Leibn. Marg. 40)
# Folio uncounted, page id 727097563:0368
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=727097563&page=368
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/727097563/jpgs/default/00000368.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

An Ansiver to the Compiler oF Nubes T est
um: Wherein is Mewn, Thac Antiquiey (in re
lacion to che Points in Controversie ser donn br
him) did not for the Arst sirc hundred Lears, BC.
liere, Teach, and Practice, as the Church oF Rome
dothatprelent, Beliere, Leach and Practice; tose.
cher micha Vindication oE reteres Vindicati trom
che late reale and dilinsenuous Actempts of che
Auchor oF Transubsantiation, detended by che
Auchor oF the AnsWer tO MIT. Sclater OF Purney.
A Letter to Facher Leris Sabran sesuit. in
ansiver co his Leuter to a Peer oF the Church
ot Enstand, Wherein che Ponseripe to the An-
Tiver 1oche Nubes Festium is Vindicated, and
Facher SabranS Mistalres Farther discovered.
A second Letter 1o Facher Cevis Sabran se
Tuit, in Ansiver to his RepIs.
A Vindication of the Principles ot the AV-
chor of che Ansiver to rhe Compiler ot Nu
bes Festium, in Ansiver t0 a late precended L. et
ter trom a Wissenter eo che Dirines oF the
Church oF Ensland.
An HiRtorical Framination ot che Authorit
et General Couneils; Mewins che False Dealine
chat hath been used in the publictine ot them.
and the Difference amons che Papits them
selres abour their Number. The Second Ldi-
tion rith Corrections and Alterations.
ADiscourse concernins che Nature ot Idola
ery: Invhich a late Author strue and onty
Nocion oF ldolatry is Considered and Confuted.
The Unreasonableness ot a Sevaration trom
che Nem Bilhors: Or, A Frearise out OF F C.
elehattical HiMory. Shemins. That althoush a
Bichop was unjusly deprird, neither HIC, nor
the Chureh erer made a Separation, iF the Suc-
eCA0