# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/746572255:0122
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/746572255:0122?run=74
# Title: [Danielis Lipstorpii Lubecensis, Specimina Philosophiae Cartesianae] Danielis Lipstorpii Lubecensis, Specimina Philosophiæ Cartesianæ (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 14; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 14)
# Folio 98, page id 746572255:0122
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=746572255&page=122
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/746572255/jpgs/default/00000122.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

98
P A R S Y E R F F A,
vincendi libidine ductus everteret Alexander, superbissimo fu-
rore ambitio sus nominis Rristoreles in Philosophorum principes
est debacchatus, unoque incendio concestas XXXVI. seculis tot
Sapientia divitias absumpsit, ex si quae voluit super esse funeri, ea
omnium ludibrio dicterii sque lacessenda tradidit posteris, dum in
optimorum bona invectus, abscissis perditisque sapientia statua-
rum capitibus, suum imposuit sinculis. Neque obscure literarii pe-
culatus reum facit Plinius inpraesatione, ad D. respasianum Imper.
NNos, quamrishac ultimo loco adducta in medio relii.
quamus, ob illastamen caulas, gnasiispramilimus, ommino
uspectum habemus Aristocelis de Philosophia Democritice.
Cimonium, in doctrina de Rerc. Nec enim verisimile app2
xet. illum Virum, quem Seneca quaest. lib VTT. CaP. 3. antiquo
rumomnium suatilisimum vocat, ex antistitem literarum, sa
pientiacanut, naturaque linguam; illum, inquam, acrem pro
tihilo, X racuo seu inanihabuisse; quod in rerum natura dari
non posse, trmissime demonstrane tu alii laniores Philolophi
omnes, cum Cartelius princ. phil. parF. 2. aFF. 16. 17. 816. NVeque
minusnobis uspecta videtur consequens illa, quaDcmocrito
eribuit, opinio, lib. 1. de caelo tic. 43. de aërisindistereria, quod
neque graris, neque lerissit. Necmoramur Craleni Virgiliiqr
celtimonium; Ili enim xtare polteriores illud dubio procul.
ab Aristorelemuruarilunt. Quapropter operam ludic Joh.
Cherlolt. Maonenus in ea detendenda, in Democrito reri.
vilcente. Nosbreriter in lequentibus capiribus e Aeris Natu-
eatm genuinam, ex experimenca cam contumantia in medium
producemus, posteaque ejus lum in Mechanicis derita com
muni eleganticimum ex admirabilissimum docebimus.
C A P u F II.
De Aeris natura.
I A F _ elFcongeriesparticularum cerrestrium tam cenuium.
l i
e a se mucuo disjunctarii, ut quibuslibet moribus globu.
loru calectium oble quantur (pressionis ridelicer seu luminis
e AuI