# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/746572255:0203
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/746572255:0203?run=74
# Title: [Danielis Lipstorpii Lubecensis, Specimina Philosophiae Cartesianae] Danielis Lipstorpii Lubecensis, Specimina Philosophiæ Cartesianæ (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 14; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 14)
# Folio 179, page id 746572255:0203
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=746572255&page=203
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/746572255/jpgs/default/00000203.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.96
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE AERE, EIVSOVE USU IN MIECTTANTCIS.
179
dici, duo quae da minima corpulcula (olida ica posse conjon-
si, utne mareria subrilissima intercedat: led polito; quod
dentur duo corpulcula adco minuta ee denla, sibigue per
quierem omnibus luisparribus sic achaerencia, ut ne vel can-
tillum spacii incercedat, incelligentur tamen ca adhuc reapsc
dirilibilia e mobilia, polunt quererera a concicatissimo par-
ticularum primi elementi motuadhuc disjungi, de exrendi,
quam iplam majorem extentionem jure dixeris ese horum
corporum raretactionem. Hlaec aucem rarefactio non effici-
tur ab accidente, lcu qualitate quadam indicibili, led a con-
citatissimamareria Tubrili, (quae cst caula unica caloris orga-
nontactus afficientis) uc proindepericulum nonlic, ne a qua-
licate rel accidenteres corporea e extenla dilacetur.
Tertium denique argumentum lubricis experientiis a in-
trmis ratiociniis nicitur, procedicque a negatione conden-
lationis ad negationem rarefactionis. Condenlationem
vero negat hilce argumentis. Primo, si pelvim aqua plenam
aeri hyemali objicias, elaciabitur aqua, ea tamen lere, ut quam
vis ad limbos pelvisque oras depressior glacies, quam antea fue-
rat, videatur, tamen in medio videas assureere, es quasi sib-
bam. Freo reparat eà mole dispendia depressionis in luttoribus,
ac proinde condensata non est, cum tantundem spatii occupet
quamvis in situ diverso, ec. Alia deinde conjectur a ad ducor,
ut necem aquam elaciatam esse densiorem fluida, quia scilicet ela-
cies supernatat: at qui videretur ex ratione frizoris constipata
macis debere fundum petere: non it aque condensatur aqua, sed
supernarat; quia subtilior aqua, subsidentibus in fundo terreis
partibus, qua multum plerum que afferunt ponderis, é aere in
transfuearum locum accitosit, ut minusponderet elacies: Quod
autem in elacie includatur aer, videbis, si luci oppositam intuea-
ris, tota enim est ampullis distincta. Tertio colliquata metalla
non plus occupant loci, quam solida concretave; quod patet in
arte fusoria: exprimuntur enim minutissimi in sabulo pili,
quod