# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/746572255:0291
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/746572255:0291?run=74
# Title: [Danielis Lipstorpii Lubecensis, Specimina Philosophiae Cartesianae] Danielis Lipstorpii Lubecensis, Specimina Philosophiæ Cartesianæ (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 14; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 14)
# Folio 35, page id 746572255:0291
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=746572255&page=291
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/746572255/jpgs/default/00000291.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

CODERNTCAS REDEVTVUS.
Planctarum motus regat ac subernet in xthere liquido. Sed haec ipsire-
linquo. Ilac autem univerli lampas in loco Tuo circa proprium axem
yrac, unamque converlionem intra dies riginti septem absolvit, uei ar-
ouitur ex constantissimo ejus macularum motu, primitus a Lyncco ACa
demico derecto, e postea a P. Christophoro Scheinero, (postcujus di-
ligentiam nihil circa iltarum macularum phaenomens deliderari polse
videtur) contirmato, in ROla TTrEma. DChilce maculis rarie rarii phi-
lolophantur. Keplerus Solem noltrae telluri similem putat exhralario-
nibusinfici, ee nubibus nonnunquam obtegi, quarum rariores a splen.
doris intensisima rirtute rincantur, denliores possint oculo arMLaLO CON-
spici, densissima etiam nudo. Scheinerus insulas in Sole liguido ober-
rantes existimat. Dui Scheinerum sequuntur, cas Solaris Oceani perenni
Auxupromoreri, tempestatibus inclinari, declinari, abigi, et nonnun-
quam ubmersiputant. Malaxertius lidera esse judicans, AustriacanO-
minarit. Antonius Rcita rero maculas omnes repudiat, tam vanum esse
eas signi ant existere in aut circa Solarem discum existimanS, qu a (IE
rana existentia chimaerae. Scd pace hujus Viri dixerim, in eonimis prae-
cipitanterasit, quod maculas Solares cum chimera comparet, quarum
camenproductionem, e rationi, et laux Philolophix optime consen-
taneam esse, postea octendam. Omid erso ipse ctatuie. Corporacse
rult extra Solem existentia, Malapertium secutus. Contirmat autem sen-
cenciam Tuam aliqua expexientia, quam ex lib. de 12 Scellis p. 7 4 ec 75.
hic apponam. Eclipsin, inquie, nuper 10 april. conspexi haud exiguam in
medio solaris disci: globum nempe caruleum perfectisime spharicum, ovi maximi
sallinacei magnicudinem revera excedentem: Et quodstupendum, inteeris quasi 60
horis in disco Solari oberrantem, neque ficuram spharicam mutantem, verum lu-
cidam faculam, ceu corpus quoddam suam umbram secum crrancem; donec infra
disci soluris centrum mulcum depressus versus pericaum sese paulatim conspectui
subduxerit: id que non in charca, in obscura camera rubo opposico, sed oculo armato
in ibso sole exacte conspexi. Continebat aurem de partibus diametri Solaris 64 tres
parriculas unius inteorae partis quasi. Hinc necessario concludo, dictrm globum; seu
verius stellam, totius telluris medietatem ad minus continere. Item es beri, alter
globus priori es magnitudine es forma, es colore haut multo inferior, in Orientali
disei solaris placa apparuit, duas quasi faculas efficiens, quem ex adhuc bodie pro-
cul dubio conspicere licebit, _c. Scd ut ingenue Fatear, quod sentio, nOn
oportet essenos nimium credulos in mulciplicandis Nacurx miraculis;
nequenosrae oculorum aciei nimis tribuendum est, quae noslape egre-
sie Fallit, ac decipit. Cuid enim Frequentius, quam quod oculi nimia
lucis actiritate deludantur? Dubio procul globuli obferrati maculie ee
Facu-