# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/769497845:0021
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/769497845:0021?run=74
# Title: Marii Nizolii De Veris Principiis Et Vera Ratione Philosophandi Contra Pseudophilosophos Libri IV (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 26; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 26)
# Folio - , page id 769497845:0021
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=769497845&page=21
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/769497845/jpgs/default/00000021.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

5) 0 (d
anouetugiendilune, de abstinendum inprimis illis pexe dicamento.
tum rocabulis plerum que ab ululatinx linguxe remorissimis. Con
Sicurae Cemel detinitioni constantissime insistendum est, ica uc ubique
eriam ( definitionem definito substicueres nulla locutio abturda se-
quatur; sed erhi detinitionem nullam praemileris, debee ta-
mmenuniformis esse rocisulus, ica ur cadem utrobique detinitio lub.
Ricui posiE. Atque ita patet dato vocabulo quae adhibenda sit sienica
eio, videamus, es contra: datae penificationi quod adhibendum sit vocabu-
lum. Quainre a compendii e claricarisratio habenda est. C la.
cicasantem maxima estin Terminis e mediolumris, ulu eriam po-
pulariretento; oblcuricas semper aliqua in Technicis. Terminum
(liccat enim hoc lenlu Permininomine uti, uc lignificeerocem qua-
cenussigniticata est, nili vocabuli nomen substituere marelis, quod
mequidemnon invito tiet) popularem roco cum rox de lignificatio
ulirata est; rechnicum, cum vel rox velsioniticatio prirata (seu CCKtO
hominirelhominum generipropria) elt. Si ipla rox priraca elt,
sequitur ue Facta sic per quandam orouxsovorian qualia sunc pleraque
vocabula Der Hothmelschen Oprache cuius L exicon in compen-
diohaber Gelnerusin Michridare. Fst aurem in hoc rocabulit.
cio, illud imprimis arrendendum, ut non calu quali d arbirrario ani-
miimperu, Cedratione quadam efformetur, racio aurem quo aprior,
hoc laudabilior. Racio Formandi apricudinem habertum a Radi-
ce, cum a modo formandi, Radix deber essoulicaca, ex rei quamno-
vorocabulo delignare contendimus, quanrum hcri porestpropin-
qua, Analogia debet esse a ulitata e apta, itauc ex significarione
radicis e analogix contlari vocabuli novi definitio quam intendi-
uS, PONIC. V. 8. Caccenas non habet analogiam ulicaram, nelior el
Sec: hocciras, (velhoccimonia) uri quiaditas, nonquaedeitas. Tam ex
Hloccitaris radice e analogia consari ejus definitio porest, nam
Hlocciraris radix esthoc; analogia, itas. Analosia aurem ilta scu de-
rivandi racio ligniticarrationem appellacionisin radice, scu quali-
catem radicis quarenus talis est, qualis ese dicieur, erit igitur Liocci
rasratio cur aliquiddicatur hoc (uri qualirarem detinit Aristoreles,
a qua