# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/769497845:0333
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/769497845:0333?run=74
# Title: Marii Nizolii De Veris Principiis Et Vera Ratione Philosophandi Contra Pseudophilosophos Libri IV (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 26; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 26)
# Folio 265, page id 769497845:0333
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=769497845&page=333
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/769497845/jpgs/default/00000333.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 63 lines, status machine
# Lines: 63 recognised, mean confidence 0.76
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

e
siI
iortI
ci
st
105el
linm
oueilb
IaseVI
M Cet
r0ba
aterid
sni
lati
C0b.
(
s
iMt
tetaS)
pes.
rata
CMa
10l0
sP
LIBER SIL. CAP. VII.
e Soruma cacctaos aturales, aeq; etiam morales ec ciriles. Onamobrem
ucdixi, quo cunqe se se rertant PSeudophilo (ophinon portunt effugere quinta
colorem e lonum res mathematicas esse conticeantur, quam lineas ee superfi-
cies: e denique quin prorsus delipere e delirare rideantur, cum ua illa plus.
quam sexcenries stulca abstractione, quae neq: in contemplandis rebus divinis
estnecessaria, quoniam ipsae satis per se sume abstractae a materia, nec ut ab ca
Separentur ulla intellectus nostri ope indigent: Nec in rebusmathemaricis,
quoniam resmathematica, nt considerentur eodem modo. quo naturales, nec
separari a singularibus nec absrahi, quianon possunt, Sed congregariearum
Singularia comprehendiq: mence, atque ica comprehensaconsiderari, probari
_ demonstraridebent: Nec deniq; in iaturalibus aucullis aliis, quae conside-
rentur dnobis, de de quibus artesscientix que cradantur, in omnibus enim his
latis superg; est comprehenhio illa singularium, quamtories dixi, per incelle-
etum, e consideratio eorumunirorle, hoc est, simul d semel omnium. Hic
enim comprehedendi e consideradirerum modus jam in de a principio mun-
di semper Fuit approbatus ee usurpatus a doctissimis quibusq; viristam Crecis
quam Latinis recteloquentibus, non solum Oratoribus le d eriam Philolophis
cum non Pleudonhilosophorum sed doctorum hominum vel Oracoruin vel
Lacinorum more loguebantur, Aeille alcer modus, quo seistires consideran-
das d tradendas perintelle ccum abstrahere a quasiprodigiole a materia sepa-
tare dicune, a remine unquam, niliP seudophilo loplio _ linguarum corrupto-
retuitapprobatus aut ulitatus. Non à Platone, qui ponebarnon univer faliaco
modo, quo Aristoceles, Ped Ideasillas suas tallas quidem ec ranas: Ped multo
minus Falsicaris ac ranicatis quam unirer salia continentes: non ab lIOcrate,
non a Zenophonte, non a Demosthene, non ab ulloalio Graeco, quodsciam.
nili Pseudophilo(opho: non àM. Fullio, nOn à Varrone, nOn a SeneCA, nOn
a Plinio, _ne omnes singillarim persequar, non ab ullo Lacinorum recerum,
Cednecrecentiorum, nisi barbaro et Philosophix pleudaristorelica Sectatore.
Ouare qui recte philolophari cupiune, nullo pacto recipiant autprobentictas
Fallas e commentitias abstractiones Pseudophilosophorum, le d easrejiciane
e prorsus improbent:pro certo habentesin nulla demonstrarione sireproba-
cione ram mathematica quam phylica ee naturaline cessaria eseiltam abstra-
ctionem lophilticam: _ coplanemodo conliderari e probari e demonstrari
resmathematicas, Sicutres naturales, hoc est, comprehendendo singularia
corumunirerla sire in unirerlum, (ire generaliter, sire cunctas Curul ee lemel,
qua omnia idem lunc. Ecdeniqueres naturales, Simodo iltud, quod rocant,
abtteabi, oliquid ell. 10 minus clle ab Aeactas a maleria quareo machematra.
Nai