# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/769497845:0393
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/769497845:0393?run=74
# Title: Marii Nizolii De Veris Principiis Et Vera Ratione Philosophandi Contra Pseudophilosophos Libri IV (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 26; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 26)
# Folio 325, page id 769497845:0393
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=769497845&page=393
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/769497845/jpgs/default/00000393.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.85
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

N.
Ie
LIBER IV. CAP. IV.
maxime propriam, eo quia extali demonstratione gigni athEmaEuE: e pe
Aremo destructa Scientia, necessario ruere eriam lapientiam illam, ab Arilto-
cele in sexto Fchicorum, eantopere celebratam; quae exscientia e intellectu,
uciple aic, compolira est. Ulemanifesto apparear cadencibus universalibus
realibus, noporse stare nec demonstrationem, nec scientiam, nec lavientiam:
_quihaec defendere ac cuerinoluerre, eum necesse habiture prius defondere
unirerlalia, quae sunttasquam columnae quae dam eorius dislectiex Facultatis.
CAPUT OIARTUM.
De Cophisticis elenchis ab Aristotele in Rhetoricam non recte
introductis, e5) de libro sophisticorum elenchorum quid
Ristaeles nontolum in Dialecticam, sed eriam in Rheroricam
haud scio quamrecte, cerre multum pexter consuetudinem alio-
rum Rherorum ineroduxie specialem eractatum de non veris, sed
apparencibus rsumenris: carerienim Rhetorestam graci quam
latini Cerip ferunt ilti quidemetiam de argumentiscum necellariistum proba-
Bilibus, Ced de appareneusdsumeneis nominatim in Rhecorica nemo un-
quam reterii, quod (cim psi praecer Aristorelem, qui tractatum iltum in
Digleecicisappellarie o m35 enczx85, hoc est, Fallaces d capriolas FeDre-
hentiores: in RHCEOLLIIS VeTO paNONEVON ErBVNNUAZOV ZO7ES, HOC CH,
apparentium enchrnem (0c0s. Quo in tractaru quamris ab imperi-
ea Pleudophilosophoram ba existimetur cradidisse omnes modos, quibus
Follacix intendi pollums cam in dictione quam exera dictionem, e caip(a de
TeHeCDerFeCFUS neCMes a quoquam Fcribi aue disseri potuisse, Tamen nOS
inhroc quognelibioo pacca ab e0 fuisse peccaer, e multo melius inultoq3
perfectius scribi pocuns ericer sumus ostenturi. Primoenim liccctradat
muleosmodostexena us, tam in dictione, urdixi, quam extra dictione,
camennon paucos utro que platermittit. Deinde ex eorumnumero, quos
eradie, nonnullosincom a obscure, ne dicaminepre, nominat: e aliis
quibuldam non lacis clara, sed lcura e pene xnigmatica exempla apponit.
Inlophismatibus enim diccromsoniccicillos aliosmodos, cum tallaciainten-
dicur relab eo, quod smentarione cranlicus fit d voce proprie sumpraad
rocem tigurate acteeuur Socrates esthomo, homoest genus, ergo Socrates
temnnaum.
d