# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/770507670:0049
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/770507670:0049?run=74
# Title: Institvtionvm Peripateticarvm Liber Qvartvs, Continens eam Metaphysicæ partem quæ explicat essentiales rationes corporum.Ad mentem summi viri, clarissimique Philosophi Kenelmi Eqvitis Digbæi. Pars Theorica (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 29; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 29)
# Folio 19, page id 770507670:0049
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=770507670&page=49
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/770507670/jpgs/default/00000049.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.86
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DnE
e1I
IIII
CII
1I
N
Liber T. Lectio V.
29
8. Et hoc modo vox entis leu esse
excenditur ad decem genera explica-
ca. Cum enim ens dicatur quod ha-
bec esse; Colum primum genusvindi-
cac nomen entis in hac lignificacio
ne, quatenus substantia prima, seu
suppolicum, Peu hypoltals, de
in substantiis racionalibus perlo-
na: hisenim nominibus idem sieni-
fcatui.
9. Cerera autem non habent esfe,
sed Tune affectiones, seu quaedam de
terminationes habentis cslc v. 8. eAe
Socracem vel Calliam homines, eAt
vere habere esse _ lubltatias csfe: sed
Calliam esse eiuldem naturae; cuius
est Socraces, quod dicimus esse rela-
tionem identicatis, neque differe ab
ipss, e per consequens non pocest
habere essenihi in iplis ex iplorum el-
Cc; e camen secundum hanc nocio-
nem non est quod hoc habent cAc.
Hlabet itaque esse haec identitas, non
quia ipla secundum luam nocionem
det este, seu st qua res habet esse, led
quia est nocio explicans rem, qua
secundum aliam notionem habet
esse.
10. Lito