# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0316 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0316?run=74 # Title: An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 38; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 38) # Folio 300, page id 778263916:0316 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=778263916&page=316 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/778263916/jpgs/default/00000316.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 57 lines, status machine # Lines: 57 recognised, mean confidence 0.91 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. Maxims. Every one chat has any Rnowledee ac all, has, 25 the. Tourdarion oF. it, various and distinet ideas: And it is the frst act ot the Mind, (wictr. out irtrich, it can never be capable ol any Rnomledsc,) to linom everr one oF irs Ideas by it Celt, and distinguishr it trom ochers. This is tMat erhich every one tinds in himselt, chat the Ideas he hashe knors; heknois also irhen anx one is in his Inderttandins, and erhat it is: And When more than onc are there, heknorsthem distinctly and unconsulecly one trom another: Which alvays beins (0, (it beins impossible buc chat he Tould perceire erhat he perceires,) he cari never be in doube irhren aur Idea is in his Mind, that it is there, and is that Idea it is; and FhaL EVO distinct Ideas, wrtren elies are in his Mind, are there, and are nor one aud the same Idea. S0 that all such AParmations, and Negations, are made ichout ans postibilitr oF doubr, uncertaintr, or helitation, and must necessarils be assented to, as soon as understood; chat is, as loon as e have, in our Mincs, the Ideas elcar and diltinct, whuch the Termsin the Propolition Cand For. It is not therelore alone to thele tro general Propoltions, Whatsoever i5, i5; and, It is impossible for the same Thine to be, and not eo be, that this Selfevidence belones by any peculiar riglt. The perception ot beino, or not beine, belonos no more no thele raoue Ideas, Cgnihed By cheterms hatsoever, and Thing, than it doesto any Other Ideas. The Mind, without the help ot any proot, perceires as cleariy, and bnos as certainty, that the Idea otWrhire, is the Idea oE Wrhire, and not the idea oF Blue; and thac che idea ot Whice, Wrhen it is in the Mind is there, and is not absent; and (0 a Triangle, Motion, a Man- or any other Ldeas Whratloever. Sothat in relpect of Identiry, our intuirive Rnomledse reaches as Par as our Pdeas: And so ve are capable oFmaking as many selF evident Propolitions, as re have names for, di sinct Ideas. And Iappeal to ever ones omn Mind, Whether this Pro- Dolition, ACircle is a Circle, De nOE aS SelF evident a Propolition, a5 that consistins oF more general terms, Whatsoever i5, i5: And again, Whether this Proposition, Blue is not Red, DC nOL a Propolition that thoMind can no more doube os, as soon as it understands che Nords, than it does otthat Axiom, Et is impossible for the same thine robe, and not zo be: and P0 OF all tho like. 6. 5. Seconcly, AStO Corexistence, or such a necessary connexion be- treen tro Fdeas, that in che Subjeet erhere one of them is supposcd, there the ocher must recessarils Dcalso: OP such aereement, or disagree. ment as this, the Mind has an immediate perception but in very sew ot them. And cherelore in this Pore, we have buc very liccle intuitive Hnomledse: nor are there to be found verr mans Propolitions chat are settevident, thouch some there aro; 2. 5. The Idea ot Alling ot a place equal tO the COntenES OF its superticies, being annexed to our Ldea of BodY, IThinls it is a sell. erident Propolition, That tuo Bodies cannot be in the same place. 66 Tpiralr, AS Eo the Relations et Modes, Mlathematicians have Framed many Arioms concerninq that one Relation et Equalier. AS Equals talcen trom Fquals, the remainder will be Equals; irhich, Witt the rest ol that bind, horrever thes are receired for Maxims by theMa- chemaricians, and are unqueltionable TrutHs; vet, I Think, that anr one ertio considers them, rill not find, that thes have a clearer selF evidence than thele, that one and onc, are equal to two; that il rou talse From ehe tive Fingers et onc eland trro, and trom the tive Fingers ot enc orter Farl tiro, the remainins number will beequal. Thele, and a thouland ortier tuct Proxolirions mas be Lourd in Nuribess, uhich, ut very sust her rinS. BC