# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com # Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0358 # Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/778263916:0358?run=74 # Title: An Essay Concerning Humane Understanding (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 38; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 38) # Folio 342, page id 778263916:0358 # Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=778263916&page=358 # Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/778263916/jpgs/default/00000358.jpg # Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 54 lines, status machine # Lines: 54 recognised, mean confidence 0.91 # Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German. # Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text. # Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote". # After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line. Reaioi and tic Order, to makce their Connexion and Force be plainly and casily perceired; the chird is the perceiring their connexion; and the fourth, the matins a rishe conclusion. Thele severai degrees maz lo observed in any rmathematical Demonstration: it being one thine to perceive the connexion of each part, as the Demonstrarion is made by anoctier; another to perceire the dependence ofthe conclusion on aIl the parts; a third eo makce out a Demonstration cleariy and neatly ones selt, and lomethins difterent trom all chese, to hare tirst Found out those intermediate Ideas Or Proots by irhich it is made. 8. 4. Fhere is one thing more, wrtrich P. Mall desire to be considered concernins ReaIon; and chatis, Wherter Syllocism, as is generalls thought, Betheproper instrument ot it, and che uletussest as ot exercilins chis Faculer. The Causesthave to doubt, are thele: First, Because Syllosilm serres our Reason, but in onc onty olthefore- mentioned parts oFic; and chat is, to Bhem the connexion oFthe Proots in ans onc instance, and no more: but in this, it is olno great ule, since themindcan perceire such connexion rhere ic really is, 25 casily, Day, verhaps, becter vithout it. TEve will obserre the Actingsof our omnMsinds, re all sind, that We reason best and clearest, wrhen we only observe the connexion of the Prools, Without reducins it to any Rule oF SyIlosism: and theretore re mas take nocice, thar chere are mans Men char reason exceedins clear and ristuly, irho bnow not how eo malie a Ssllosilm. IIc chat will. look into many parts oF Asa and america, rill tind Men reason there, perhaps, as acurels as himsels, Wrho vet never heard ofa Syllosiim, nor can reduce ans one Aroument cothole Forms. Indced Poretimes it may serve to discover a Fallacy hid in arhetorical Flourish, or cunning ly vrrapp d up in a snooth Period; and stripping an Ablurdity of the Cover ol Wic, and sood Languase, Me ic in its naled Deformity: But the Mind is not caushr to reason by these Rules, it has a natire Faculty to perceire the Coherence, or Incoherence of its Ideas, and ean ranse them rislt, rithout anr such perplexins Repetitions. Tell a Counery Cientlewoman, that the Wind is South. Welt, and the Weather lourins, and like to rain, and sre ill easily understand, tis not sase for her to go abroad thin clad, in such a dar, atter a Fever: Bhe clearly sces the probable connexion oF alt chese, 2iz. South West. Wind, and Clouds, Rain, ectins, calcins Cold, Relapse, and Danser oF Death, withoue yinsthem together in thole ar titicial and cumberlome Ferrers ol sereral Ssllosisins, that clos and hinder che Mind, Which proceeds trom one part to another quicler and clearer without them; and the Probabilitr irhich Me calily perceires in Things thus in their natire State, rould be quite lost, il this Arsument. Were manased searnealr, and proposed in Mode and tisure. For it very olten consouvds the connexion: an, P thint, every one will perceive in mathe. matical Demonstrarions, that thekno ledse sain dtherebr, comes Mhor- test and elcarest without Syllosilm. Secondly, Because thoush Syllosim serres to Mem the Force or Fallacy oF an Argument, made use ot in che ulual ras ot discoursins, by lupply- ins the absent Propolition, and so sertins it betore the vier in a clear Ligl; vet it no lels engages the Mind in the perplexier ot obleure, equi vocal, and Fallacious Terms, Wrhererith this artiticial was of Reasonins alirars alouncs: it beins adarted more to the atrainins ol Victory in Dispure, chan che discovers or contirmation ot Truch in fair Enquirses.