# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0029
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0029?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 17, page id 797937889:0029
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=29
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000029.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 44 lines, status machine
# Lines: 44 recognised, mean confidence 0.84
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

ICM
lent
AaS
Ma
ise
H
hitB.
butes of God Will be consider d in their
ordor, erhich leadsus to thesecond Head,
Ot wtich theRemarter.
As to Reveat d Relision, my Difficulty i5 1A. R. p. PC.
only this, hon it can be prov d from jour
Principles, that the Author of the, Revela-
tion is veracious; and P. 7. t0 establist the
certainty of Reveal d Relision, me must hnom
the Moral Actributes of the Divine Nature
such as Goodness, fustice, Foliness, and
particulariu Veracity. Non these l am not
able to deduce from vour Principles. Tou
have provd very well un Pternal aPomer-
ful and M. Knomins Berns: but, Ec: The
Remarker, it lecms, does not find
rrtiat MIT. Lock lars, alter he has very
ell provd an Eternal, most Povertul,
aud mostKnomine Beins; That from this Es. B, 4.
Idea duly considerd, will easils be deduc  C. 10. 5. 6
al those other Attributes me oueht to as-
eribe to this Fternal Beins; the Remarkcer
15 not able to do it, tho to help him,
NIT. Lock Cays, he may be asam d to have
rais a such a doubt as this, viz. hether an
Infinitely Poverful and Wise Beins be vera-
cious, or no antess he concludes Lying to he
no Mark of Weabness, and Folly. ASIFel 2d. R. P. 30
in his Words repeated by the Remarker,
ertrich he complains ot, acmisrepresentins.
qu
5)
and pervertins his Sense; Lhe Question 25
not (Cars he) nhether Crod be veracious, but
mhether, accordins to jour Principles, hecan
be provd to be so. Antw. But the Oue-
Rion is, whether an Infinitely Pomerful, and
NI