# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0030
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0030?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 18, page id 797937889:0030
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=30
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000030.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.89
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Wise Berns, Es veracions or non For JuCH a
Beins, MIT. Lock has very well provd, 25
the Remarker omns, lo that theDoube
ust Be, Wrhether, a5 (uch, he must be ve.
racious; For il the Remarker allors Ve-
racity to be a Consequence oF Insinite
Pover and Wisdom, the Veracitr ot G0d
is peora by MP. Locks Principles; and
this is an ablurd Ouestion, Whether the
Veracitr ot Aod ean be provd tron his
Principles it Falsbood is allow d +o De
a Mark of Weatness and Folly, For then it
cannot possiblr be admitted in a Beine
ou
ertricti ne has provd. OE Infinite W 2)dom
and Pover: and l Lno no Becter ray
oF provins any thins, chan. by provine
Principles uxon irtrich it cannot be de-
ny d withont a Contr
MIT. Lock has not perverted tne Remmar
KorS hense, tor he cannot avoid this Di-
lemina Ficher he concludes Falthood,
to be a Mark of Weakness and Folly or
tie does noc; il nor, then MIT. Lock has
xI5
docs, then this is an absurd Ouestion.
erhrether ore who has provd an Inti.
niteli Povertul and Wile Beins, can
Prore he is not Falso.
Pue this is not Pulticient tor che Re
marker, he is not able to deduce one At.
tribute From another; L et us leo then
wrtrat is his ray to bnor the Moral
Aetributes oF God, Wrhich he tells is this,
tre ascribes Veracitr to Crod, becouse it is