# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0040
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0040?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 28, page id 797937889:0040
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=40
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000040.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Came Mansnot beine the same Mlan. Ile lay
indeed, thatif the soul can nhilst the Body is
Rccpine, have its thineine and enjoyments apari
ihicb che Man is not at all Conscions of, his Soul
When hesteeps, and the Man consistins oF Bodi
and Soul, when he is maline, are tvo Fertons.
And he Farther illustrates che lame ching in his
Discouese oF Castor and Polux, Which it it be
thouohe ablurd to altert, eis not hard to
find what that Discourse aims ac, v. 8. 1o
Them that Cuch an ablurditr will follon From
this suxpolition, That the soul chintes when
the Man is noc Conscious oF it. BUE
ertacever that Discourse aiins aC, oF Wvtat
Conequence can it be coche Immortaliey ot
chesout, supposins it does not alvays chink:Thae
ehe Remarteer Cays nochins oF. Buc it Wwils noc
De iniprover here to takre notice ot an Interence
he drans trom it in his second Remartess That
NIr. Lock does nor think che soul a Permanent
Substance distinct From the BOdy. This (CayShe)
(cems to be the Supposition non eo upon, rohen jout
question whether a Man mahine and scepine rich-
DuE Thonches be the fame Man. IF there bestilt
thesame Sonl, the Came permanent Substance, I see
noroom for shat Duestion, or Doubr, which pou
make. Elere ehe Queltior is again curnd, not
onty Erom the same Person eo the Tame Man,
Dut to Rcevine mithont Thoushes, trom Acep.
ins mith Thouches, that he is not conscions of,
wrhich are very ditterent Cales as to this Oue
Ation, tho much che lame indecd, a5 to the
ehins ir Celt, bue that che Remarkeer non t al
lor. But perhapshe cakes thesoul, Man and
Person, ro henitre the Came chins, aud s0 ther
mas tohim; everrManhastheliberey tomalie
his onn Wordsstand For what Idca he plealesi
Duc when he argues ao2inst cheOpinion ot an-
ocher, he mule conlider in irhat sense chole
Perms are us d by chat orher, and in chaesente
oppol