# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0076
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0076?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 64, page id 797937889:0076
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=76
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000076.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.87
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

ibid
64
Aud cherotore t0 Cay Chac the Fxercise et
ehis Porer dependsupon them, is the lame
ehins as 2o Pay, ttiat the Porer ot distin-
Suimins ehinso withoui Rariocination, de
Dends upon Rariocination. Wvhich, it the
Remarker understands, I Beliere he ill
hardIy. make ic intellisible to aus bods
eIsC.
From all these Obscrrations compar du
ind righeli applsd, it rii plainls ap
Dear that Mr. Lockis very lictle concernd
in ehis Discourse, Wrhich, the Remarker
TarS, i5 in detence ot Natural Conscience,
aeainst Whom Iknon not, thCMOLE DaLE
ot it beine arguments for chingo irhrich
MC. Lock no lels afirms than He; Io he
appear eo oppolehim, byusins ME. LockS
Vords in a disterent sense From that
erhich tie understands tnem in; and those
Arsumenes by irtich the Remarker realy
does oppose him, beins anticipated and
Fusy Ansiver d in ME. LocKS F NaY.
And trom ehe inconsistency ot his De-
tinicion et Natural Conscience, wich nis il.
lustracions of it in several places, and his
toose and undetermin d use ot those Perins
irhich’are ot greatest consequence in this
Discourse, I must take leave to conclude,
That he has not Ax d in his omn Mind a
elear Idea ot that Principle irhich he
contends For; tho hethintes he has giren
Rules, and Martes, Dy rhich ic may sut-
Acienely appear eo others vhat he means
Dy it; and theretore by those Marks l
il endearour a licele eo clear his oin
Notion
in
de
b