# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0077
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0077?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 65, page id 797937889:0077
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=77
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000077.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Notion tohim; and For nis Patisfaction to
eltabli irhat I think Natural Conscience
15, accordins to Mr. LockS Principles,
and in thetrue Notion oF ic; tho MT. Lock
is without reason broughe into this Dis-
pute, as is crident trom the Remarker
Ornmoras; L de not remember (CayS he)
that in this sense von have once nam d Na - 3R. P. 5.
tural Conscience in jour Book: WVhy thenl
pray are (o mans Argumenes usd, a5 ithe
had irrit a Wrhole B00k asainst it. By
irhrat Rule is a Man concluded to deny
erery thins that hehas not aftirm d: But
the Remarker is not the tirst who has
ehioughe this sood Loeick, and fair deal-
ins asainst Mr. Lock; thaterer he nrites
HexE, iF it Mond DC OF Gravitation, Or the
Notions of the Planets, Pchink he mon d do
Wrell to put the Articles of his Religion at
the cnd ot it, For tear he Mou d bC accus d
oF harins nonc, it his B00k Moud nOE
happen to name any.
BuL 25 Eo Nacural Conscience, I detire
the Remarker to examine rrhether that
Principle he Speaks OE, Or (a5Ihad rather
exprels it here, a5 less Equirocal) that
Pover oE distinguittrins in Maral thines
vithout Ratiocination, DC not a consequent
ot a previons Ratiocination, or Instru-
ction; by irhrich, havins sot soie clear or
confus d Idcas ot crooc and Fvil, 2 diE-
serent attec
rileetrom them, and this Poimmediate, a5
that it may De truly Caid Eo DC withour
Ratioeination; Fromirhich, che mistake
MaG