# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0082
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0082?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 70, page id 797937889:0082
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=82
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000082.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.87
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

 8
cleariy Hnomn by the Light of ReaIOn, to
ans onc irho sets himselt toscarch. This
Deins Wrhrat I beliere the Remarker will
noc chink FE to deny, Itate for granted,
and delire him to consider, whether a
Man, in irhom the Dictates ot Conscience
(supposins them Innate) hare been carty
obicur d, Or perverted, beins broushe to
a bnorledse ot his Dues bY RCaTON, OX
Reflection, Whether Y P2Y ThisMan has nOL
a Ture foundation for Hatural Relision,
ithoue takins in his Principse ot Con-
Science for a distinction et Good and Lvil +
This he mustgrant, unless he will las chat
General, obscure and indistinet notices (For l0
he describes his lunate Principles) arC a
Decter Foundation for Naturat Relision,
s
than clear and distinet Rnomledse; Whici
iF it DC 1oo abturd to astere, the Remarkei
must omn, notrichstandins his écal for
innate Principles, thac those wtro deny
them mar hare a Pure Foundation for Na-
cural Relision, a5 lons a5 the Prcccpts ot
ic are contistent wich, or Frident eo the
Lisht OF ReaIOn.
And tarcher I suppose the Remarker
Wrils very readils allor, that when a Man
is thus broustit br Rcalon to a true sense
ot his Dues, his Conscience, tho Detore
perverted, will then Be set ristit, and
chencetormard Condeimn, or Acquit him,
accordins as he obers or not that Lan
erhich his Understandins has assented to
and this withont Ratiocination, by an im
mediate affection oE ihe Mind: Buc let