# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0086
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0086?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 64, page id 797937889:0086
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=86
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000086.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.86
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

 aY
C
64
erace co those Originals And the Porer
or Faculties ot receirine Idcas, no lets re
quire a permanent Substanceto Exist in,
than Idcas themselres. Moreover ((27e
he Remarker) upon that Lsypothesis the sont
cannot be said eo be immortal. And Wrhat is
tnat; IpCaY, tO MT. LockE IIaS he auy
votere coldus that the soul cannot be Taid
+o BeImmortar Doeshe not Freguenti
proters a AedFast beliet that thesoul is
d mmortal: IIas he not zcalousy con-
tested that our ignorance ot ihat kind ot
SuBitance the sont is, doco not at aI
eallen the alturances of itsmmortality
Why Then is this, Thot the Soul cannot be
said to be immorial, brought in 2s an opinion
Ot MT. LockS, but at any rate to make
that Posicion, That the sont is not a distinct
substance, De supposd a Principle ot
MIS d
Furthermore (Pays the RerrarKeE) in
conseguence of this Principle of Deilm, and
the Morraliry of the soul, creat difficulties
must needs arise tothem about the Resuirrecti.
on, TTor it can be the same Man, or the
same Perlon, that rises arain, when boththe
Body and the soul are nev and this non d
brins on nice disputes abont the Notions of
Identity, and Diversuy, wbich accordinoly
ve sind discusse d at laree inthe Essay, for their
sarisfaction,  suppose, that eo upon those Princi-
ples. IE may De 10, But the Remarker
must sire me leare to suppose 100; that
thole Notions are not discuss d for cheir
Eatisfaction alone, irto so upon cholePrin.
Ciples
Pe)
LV OccCH
et 5 24
Lbteto