# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0088
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0088?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 66, page id 797937889:0088
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=88
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000088.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

C 66
opinions oF the sout; and much more ser-
viceable to Relision, than thole can De
(Whacerer zeal ther pretend for ic) intio
Will nor allon that the Returrection, or a
Future Stace, ean bechtablisd upon any
rpochelis buc their omn; for no doubt,
it Men are convincd ot a Future State,
tis oF no consequence uxon hat grounds
ther areso, their mistakes about the sub-
Aance oF the Soul, wil noc endanger their
MOrals, Or their Salration; And iF MI.
LockS Discourse et Identity aud Diversiy.
as desiend to resolre the disticulties that
may arile about the Relurrection, that can
onlu Mem his concernto secure that Fsen
eial point uxon everr Mans Principles,
since he determinies the Ideas et Identity
aud Direrher upon sereral contrary sup
volitions; aid cherctore there can Be nO
realon to conclude ans onc of them t0 Be
his opinion more than anocher untess he
has declard in tavour ot onc, Which he
has doneero or chree times in that Chap.
Ter For Chis, That the Sont is one Individual,
Immaterial Substance, ehe direet contrary
to that whieh the Remarker nou d have
thousht tobehisovinion.
WVe corr: enom 10 thenext and last dis-
rute which the Remarker mentions a5
C. F. 24. erilies from rhac Principle, That the Soul
is not a Subs: ance distinct from l’od and Mat-
ter. Trom this Posirion (he (a75) a uestion
sprines up concernine thc Povers of Matier-
er Wrherher Natter be not capable of Cocita-
sions l Mould rather chink chis vestion
Pre.
3.5. 250