# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0090
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0090?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 68, page id 797937889:0090
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=90
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000090.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 46 lines, status machine
# Lines: 46 recognised, mean confidence 0.83
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

(68
tions; and upon tnis fallocy it is conetu-
ded ehat those wrho think thesoul may
DeMaterial, cannot suppose it to exist alter
thodirolution ot the Bodr. But that one
whothinks Cod may hare firer Percep
rion and Thouehe, 10 lome Spsteins oF Mat-
ter dispos d as he sces tt, mar suppolethis
Sem distinct from thie Body; and t0 Con-
tinue in thic Pame State et Cociration wrhen
the Body is dissolred, re hare for an In-
Stance (nOt to irention manz others) a
o tess eminent Philosopher than civero,
Who in aII his criguiries aboue etie Sub.
stanee of che soul, ent not beyond that
Macter ot Wrhich. eheHcavens are made,
Aristotle Oninta Essentia; tho he finas
reatons Eo Think it mar De immorral and
Turrivorhe Body; aud plainty distinouisses
ic trom Boay, talcen for the sensible, or-
canical parts ot a Men, tho theroiS HO.
china ot Immaterialier in au his contidera.
tions aboue the luBance ot ehe Soul.
This chenis evident, that none ot these
Discourses in ehe Fsay wrhick the Remark
ex mentions, as acrecins mith the nocion of
one Vniver(al Mlind operatine accordine ro
different Systems of. Marter, mithont any par-
ricular Thinkins Beines distinet from the  ni-
versal: Nonc ot Them, l Car, do necesta-
rili depend upon or terminace in chat
Stippolition; and some ot them do necer
Carily suppose the contrarr: Por il the
Soutis not supposd a particolar substance,
distinct trom ene Unirersal spirit, towhat
purpose are ans uections Madeor Resolrd
abOuE
10
(a1
V
0
WC
th
Loc
si
Mo