# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0091
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/797937889:0091?run=74
# Title: A Defence Of The Essay Of Human Understanding, Written by Mr. Lock (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 3)
# Folio 69, page id 797937889:0091
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=797937889&page=91
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/797937889/jpgs/default/00000091.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 51 lines, status machine
# Lines: 51 recognised, mean confidence 0.84
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

el
te
cep.
ODe
lat.
O
re
12l
le
ds
ie
de
D.
(69
about tho Returrectiond. Therei IS, 1O
Sround For Tuch an cexpectation, inrho can
cake account, or be actousitable, tor deti
ons dono here, il thez are all the opera
rions of one Unirertatspinics Andinho
Duc ehe Remarker condsind ans consiston.
er in that supposition, icn a Discourse
to fatissie Men hon ches maz conccire tho
Pame Pertons at thociesurrection, and iust
IV subjeet to Rerdnas and Punitments,
nhaterer Cblancethesoul is; or otirhat
erer Particles the Bod is made up. 2. No
TOrt oF Deists, or Sect. oF Men, that I
Enom ot, did erer reconcile thesc tro
Opinions.
Those Sects trhich theRemarker CaYS 13. P. 22.
ere noted for holdins onls onc Unirersal
Mind, consistentlr with themselres denicd
the Resurrection; and to such Men MT.
LockSDilcourse about dentiry and Diver.
siry, cond sire no Patisfaction in that
Foint, nor cond it be made upon their
Principles. Bnt I leare che Reader 10
judse wrtrat ground there is trom any ot
the Particulars mentiond, For the Re-
marker to impuce that opinion FOMI. LOcR,
and to thint that the Mlistery aimi d at all
alons in an Fslay, where upon ererr occasion
he Spcaks oF the soul as a real distinet (Ub-
Stance, in t00many places to De instanced;
and ot Mon as a treeAsent, subjeet i0 an
Eternal Retribution, accordins eo his do
inss in this Lite; anc chat (o trequentlY,
and s0 expresr, that tis impostibleto de
clare his sentimenis upon char grand Point
FOT
abid.