# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/798283424:0079
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/798283424:0079?run=74
# Title: [Tractatio Juridica De Joco, Vulgo Kälberey oder Schertz] Tractatio Ivridica De Joco, Vulgo Kälberey oder Schertz (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 41, Stück 20; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 41)
# Folio 75, page id 798283424:0079
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=798283424&page=79
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/798283424/jpgs/default/00000079.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 44 lines, status machine
# Lines: 44 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

DE JOCO CIRCA DELTCTA.
relinquitur, pro qualitate circumstantiarum aliquam poenam
doceenere. CarpzOr. in Prax. Cirim. O u. 45. n. 80. Menoch. de
2. 7. D. cas. 376. n. 4. Inde in catu, ubi quis jocole in com-
mellationidus de compotationibus verba S. Ccenx recitare-
rat, illamque administraverat, paenam carceris dictarit Facul
tas Turid. Lipsiensis, Mens. Novembr. Anno 1625. Uti videre est
ex praejudicio, quod retert C arp2. d. 8. 45. n. 100.
ZX ZII. Caeterum in perreltisandis blasphemix specie-
bus, operosum lepraebet, ex Pontiticiis, Anton. Diana. in Re-
Sol. Moral. Lom. V. Tract. 8. Resol. 13. Ubi quaerit: An qui ama-
siam suam vocet Deam suam Peine Gisttin, sit blasphemus ? Ft
negatiram amplectitur, cui quoque nos accedimus. Licot
enim illicitus lit jocus, in quo nomen Dei ulurpatur, e jocari
in rebus tanti momenti specialis sit blasphemia, quia tamen
hric nec protertur, nec accipitur, in signiticatione propria, sed
hyperbolica, pro blasphemia illud non habemus. Ouamris
ab ejusmodi inanibus rocibus abstinere tutius omnino arbi-
trCMUT. Ita quoque, si quisper jocum dicat Sanctos Crispum
Crispinianum Fuisse Putores, ec Sanctos Johannem et Paulum
amblasphe-
mus sit, qui
imasiam su-
am vocavit
multis in utramque partem coacerratis argumentis tandem
Fuisse Ernuchos, an ille sit blasphemusd disputat ibidem Diana
Tom. V. Tract. 8. Resol. 12. num. 3. Quodnoseomagisnegare
pollumus, quo minus honoris ejusmodi sanctistribuendum
credimus. Apocal. 6. 2. 9. Vid. C arp2. d. Ou. 45. n. 73.
n
Deam.
XXXITI. Peater hXeC quoque Malesicium ad Crimen Dui impedi-
lxelae Majestatis Dirina refertur, C arp2. Frax. C rim. qu. 48. n. 1. mentum co-
cujus scuti variae species Cunt, ita inprimis celebris est illa, que babitandi
Fper nodationem, ligatione ligulae, rulso T estel verenissenpcreant conju-
aut projectionem serxe clanla cum elare in aquam. Ouo qui sibus gravi
dem Scelero nihil videtur perniciosius aut execrabilius; Etenimter puniendi
creatur isto, arte Diabolica, tam arctum impedimentum noris
Conjusibus, ut nulla Ferc arte Medica, nili a ToloDco, ricis-
sim tolli possit, quemadmodum non solum rationibus, sed
etiam plurimis exemplis probatum dedit Dn. D. Simonis in
Tr. de Impotent. C onjuc. C. ap. 6. 1B. 4. 20t. Add. c. Ult. X. de Fri-
sid. Cs Malesic. Focrarius itaque puniendum, quod quamvis
165