# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/798399260:0024
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/798399260:0024?run=74
# Title: [Disputatio Ethica De Actionum Humanarum Moralitate Et Indifferentia] Disputatio Ethica De Actionum Humanarvm Moralitate Et Indifferentia (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 41, Stück 8; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 41)
# Folio - , page id 798399260:0024
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=798399260&page=24
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/798399260/jpgs/default/00000024.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

nibus rebus a jure natural mandaris vel prohibiis, ut in objecta
inteat malicia vel bonitas. Nam unanimi consensu receptum est.
actiones ex praescripeo juras nacuralis resultantes ideo bonitatem nan
cisci, quod cirea rembonam occupentue contrarius aurem vel ed tana
tum nomine contrahere pravitarem; quod circa rem malam versen
tur. Ec nonnullis interjectis 5. 28. idom ita persies Ouories
quaeriti, num hom.cidum sic fuciendum? continuo assrmat racio-
nalis creatura; Si gnaratur assertionis casa, illa dabitur, quea in
se malum est. Vera uiique causa, quae in objectoponit principium
oblicationis. Sod non quiescet curiosuo animm, ulteruu instabie
es rocabit, quare malum ic: Hlio ipsum objectum ad normam poo–
nendum eidemque applicandum est: ex qua applicatione id responsum
dabitur, qnia ex sua narura adver sacur honestaris reculae nobis im
plancata es ab hac discrepat; Si procedas ulera ex inguiras, curillud
rectae rations disconveniens malum sic? Respondebitur, quia simul a
dese eterna abhorret, cujus vis impressa est hommi. Si nec dum
Pedeat mens, Cs petat, cur leziaterna contrariecur? decisoriam accio
piet causam; non quia voluncas auc imperium divinum prohibuerit,
sed quod justieia es sanctetari divine opponatur et ab eadem deviet.
HIaec ille; Tuibus quid dici queac elegantius, aur ad percipien.
dam ulcimam moralicatis originem illuctrius non rideo. conF. Sia
napius Vissertats Frh. cap. VI. 8. 5.
ZX. Dum verii humanarum octionum bonieatem de
maliciom primio ab objectis pendere hactenus aftirmavimus, et
non minus carundem Formale in contormitare et difformitate
cum naturae lege 8. XV. concticuimus, diceree Forcassis aliquiss
liarum actionum tormale non in illa conformitare de diffor.
micace cum nacurx lege, sed pocius in contormitate de diffor
itace cum luis objectis consistere. Ad hoc aurem reponimuse
Objectahumnorum retionum spectari posse duplicicer1. ante
lecem, prouc intellisuntur illa habere quandam cum racionali
nacura convenientium aut dilconronientiam 2. pront illorum
amplexus vel juga peculiari lege jam nune imperatur; Oux lex
cum actuum circa objeaa tam bona quam mala orcupato-
rum pronima sic norma et regulo, actionum et bonarum ec ma-
barum