# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/798399260:0037
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/798399260:0037?run=74
# Title: [Disputatio Ethica De Actionum Humanarum Moralitate Et Indifferentia] Disputatio Ethica De Actionum Humanarvm Moralitate Et Indifferentia (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 41, Stück 8; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 41)
# Folio - , page id 798399260:0037
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=798399260&page=37
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/798399260/jpgs/default/00000037.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 35 lines, status machine
# Lines: 35 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

renrem actionem inter bonum ec malum mediam esse volui
uS. I. C. Calem quae in se neque bona nequemala(ic. Illa enim
quae inter virentem e vicia (unt media, indifferentia esse, dOcet
Firillus, Carthacinensis Philosopbus apud Dioeenem Laerrium, de
Vit. Doemat. es Apopheheernat. Claror. Philosoph. L ib. VII. conf.
Apolejus de Philo sophia Platonis Lib. II. ita quidem, ue quemad.
modum a vicio recedune, ita ad bonum non pertinent. IIX
actiones nonnullis permissa, aliis rectius nentra dicuntur; Ecenim
non omnes actiones permissae Cacim lune moraliter noutra,
quoniam potelt esse aliquid permissum, quod eamen lit morali-
cer malum, v. 8. cum necellicas d racio belli nonnulla excu
lac ac permittie, qua tamen in se spectara moralicer mala
tunt.
XLI. An aurem denturtales actiones, quxe in le de Tua
nacura considoratae sinc indifferentes, non heri aut nudiustertius
demum caepit controverci. Johannes iiss jam olim a Constan-
riensi damnatus est Concilio, quod incer alia perhibuerie: lla
esse opora indifferentia, sed hanc esse divisionem immediatam huma-
norum operum, quod sint vel virinosa vel viriosa. Vid. Carank a
Summa Constant. Concilii Sess. XV. Error. I. II.. Arric. 16. FE quem
Fuxit, quae incer (c bella jam aliquor recro seculis gesserineduo
illi Scholalticarum subrilicacum Archicecti Thomas ec ScotuS d
quorum ucorque, quidem dari actus secundum objectum indit.
terences, quos vocant lecundum speciem aonorie, ille aucem
huic actus indifferentes aeliberatos, quos rocane indifteren.
ces secundum indiriduum, concedero noluit. Ilorum urri.
usque mentem uc recté percipiamus eosdem paululum com-
mictemus.
XTII. ThomaSF. TI. OuXs. ZIIX. Artic. 9. octus huma.
ni indifferentiam in objecto quarendam esse docee, non autem
in ipla actionis Forma, qua pendec ab acentis incentione
ee lingularitus nonnullis circumstanciis. Diei enim actum
rulc indifferentem, qui versatur indeliberate circa cale funda.
mencum rel objectum in quo per se nulla insic rel adverri
DOTTE