# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0023
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0023?run=74
# Title: Disputatio Philosophica De Novis Ratiocinandi Adminiculis (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 1; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799210226:0023
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799210226&page=23
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799210226/jpgs/default/00000023.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 39 lines, status machine
# Lines: 39 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

S. XIIX. Advertatur ergo id, quod Cap. I. 5. X. diximus
de natura necationis Univer (arises Particularis, quod illanempe
Tic semverinter duas Species Oppolitas; haec vero inter Crenus
de Speciem. Sic ergohocprimum potetin universalinesan-
ee Subjectum de Pradicatum sempertore duas Species oppoli-
ta5. Cumerso, quae Genere differunt, inter se semper maneant
Opposita, hinc omnia Inferioraes Subjecti eS Pradicati semper
Universaliter de se invicem necabuntur, id quod patet ex NNum.
31 4. 7. 8, II. 120
S. XV. Ergo cum Conclusio in omni Ratiocinatione se-
quatur Partem Debiliorem ex Nesacira Actirmatira lequi haud
Dotest. Particularis vero proprie talis, qua oppolita est Uni-
verlali, nesatira esse haud potest, nisi Subjectum respectu Pra.
dicati lit Conceptus Superior, ergo cum num. 5. 9. 14. 16. 17. 18.
facile accidat, ut Subjectum sit Conceptus inferior Datet hanc
concludendi rationem hand procedere. Nequeetiaminde,
quod Subjectum e Praedicatum Cunt. Oppolita lequitur, quod
V. er. Subjectum oppesitum Cicera dicato, quippe in quoilla duo
conreniunt, id saltem sequitur, quod Conceptus superior SuB.
jecti relPrae dicati quoad partem oppolitus sit alterurrisubjecta
vel Praedicaco.
S. XX. Sccundus Modus Conclusiones mediatas elicien.
di cA per Propositiones Particulades. Una enim Particulari
um immediatarum alsumitur, de rite dispolitis superioribus
de Inferioribus Subjecti de Praedicati, Conclutiones secundum
Fis. TII. Schema eliciuntur. V, or. Dropolitio (it iIla 5. 3. n. 2.
Super. TIomo
Subi. 9. qui male judicat
Inter. ale aftrmat.
negat.
Impos rationis
Supo
Passionibus est deditus. Praed.
Voluptuolus
Ambitiolus  Inter.
ArarUS
D. XXI. fam ad Ductum hujus Schematisita Conclusio.
nes eliCIUNEUT:
E.