# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0025
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0025?run=74
# Title: Disputatio Philosophica De Novis Ratiocinandi Adminiculis (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 1; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799210226:0025
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799210226&page=25
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799210226/jpgs/default/00000025.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.89
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

quidem Subjecti de de Praedicati dependeret, ex ipsa vero Pro.
Positionei haud sequeretur.
S. XXIII. Tertius modus Arcumentationum Medialarum
est per Propolitiones Particulares. Negativas: ubi ex Ne-
satiris Unirersalibus Mediatis Celisitur quae cunque Parricu-
laris, e exea lecundum certumi Schema eliciunrur Conclu.
Tiones Particulares Nepatirae. AIx eth omnium minimum
habeant roboris cum de respectu Orantitaris de Oualitatis sine
intimi gradus, tamen aliquem etiam cundemque non conte-
mnendum praestant ulum, quatenus Universalitatem theseos
Oppolicae intringunt. Ouod henim aliquis aseruiset omnem
eruditum avarum; dum sic concluditur grendam cruditum
non esse ararum cadit eo iplo Universalitas theleos oppolita.
S. XXIV. Caterum Schema Parricularium Negativa.
rum tale eA:
Exemplo nobis hic elle porest Conlusio sexta supra S. XIII.
elicita, V. gr.
Super: FIOmO
imposrationis.
Subi. . Eruditus non est Passionibus deditus.
Theologus
infer.  Tureconsultus
Medicus,
Philolophus
Ambitiolus
Conclusiones jam secundum hoc Schema sunt sequentes:
3. F. D. Eruditus non est Ambitiosus.
3.
Llal
Volupruosus EInter.
AVarUS
1. D. Fruditus non est Passionibus deditus.
.
7. F. Q. vel Theolosus vel Fure Consultus vael Medicus vel Phi-
losophus non est Passionibus deditus.
oUPeT.
10..