# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0026
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0026?run=74
# Title: Disputatio Philosophica De Novis Ratiocinandi Adminiculis (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 1; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799210226:0026
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799210226&page=26
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799210226/jpgs/default/00000026.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 55 lines, status machine
# Lines: 55 recognised, mean confidence 0.77
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Fid 
22...
13. E.
24.+
15. Eo
16..
7.
.0
1
a
Tomo non est Passionibus deditus.
+
.
.
1 0
D. Ttomo non est Voluptuosus.
a
e
a
0
18..
o .0
S. XXV. Miraberis Forte, quod tam paucxe hic proce-
dant Conjunctiones, cujustamen reiratio Facile apparec, sico-
Dites Particularem Necativam pore dupliciter intelliei e assir-
mative e5 negative, v. 8. Sidico. O. animal non est homo;
simpliciter in Praedicato concipio idcam hominis negatam de
aligua conceptus Generici in Subjecto oppressi parte: ac si di-
co: O. animalnon esthomo, coiplo in Praedicato statim di-
micto ideam hominis e concipio idcam oppolitum, porius
brutinempeut adeo ejusmodieropolitio aequipolleat liuic af-
Firmanci: . animal est brutum. Unde etsi Conjunctiones
OmBes, QuaSnoSFu. 2. 45. 5. 8. 9. 20. CC. non locum habereno-
tarimus, videantur procedere, si Praedicatum Facias infinitum.
V. Or. F. O. Passionibusnon deditus est Fruditus, item F. .
amibitiolus esteruditus; tamen ejusmodi Conclutiones seque.
nentur ex illa Fundamentali, non gnatenus est Necativa, Led qua-
tenus rirtualiter affirmativa; adeOque FUINC PTOCCdUINEOIINES
Conclutiones secundum Schema s. XVI.
S. XXVI. Ouodvero exejusmodi eropolitionenegatire
intellecta, plurime Conjunctiones haud procedant, demonstrari
Facile pocest ex nacura Propolicionis particulariter negantiso
(dequa vid. Cap. I. 5. X. E XT.) qua in coconsistit, ut Subje-
ctum sit Conceptus Suxerior, Praedicatum Interior: Unde
quando subjectum potest fieri Conceptus inferior, Praedicatum Su-
perior, ratiocinatio non procedie, de hociplum est, quodim-
Pedit, quo minus admicti voetint numeri plerique hujus
5. XXVII.
Schematis.
S1g
Superioea
Subjectum
user
it
teim