# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0034
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0034?run=74
# Title: Disputatio Philosophica De Novis Ratiocinandi Adminiculis (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 1; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799210226:0034
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799210226&page=34
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799210226/jpgs/default/00000034.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 33 lines, status machine
# Lines: 33 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

mabuntur de Subjecto. AEsi PropolitioCic particularis Affir-
mans, itidem illi Conceptus Inferiores non procedent: Prae-
dicatum enim eropolitionis Fundamentalis debet in Minori A-
eri subjectum, (5 sic non posset facerenisi minorem Particularem
Secundum principia C aP. 1. 5. 12. Sic syIlogilmus constaret ex
puris earticularibus, id quod ablurdum. AE VerO (I PrOPOLI-
tio(t Nesativa, necato Genere necantur es lingulae species, un de
tunc potest alsumi terminus novus Inforior, qui tamen sem-
per Particulariter debet conjurgi cum subjecto, ut Conclusio
sequatur partem debiliorem.
S. XIII. Flactenus vidimus quomodo ex aliqua Propo-
Pitione duobus C tribus terminisnorae eliciantur Veritates, nune
perpendendum quoque, quomodo id contingat quatuOr.
Dec CA, quod mireris, quatuor quoque terminis posse constare
Syllosismum, cum vulgaris doctrina cidem. non concedat nisi
tres: mirandum potius, quod tor seculorum decurlunemo
hanc argumentandi rationem agnoscere voluerit; cujus ta-
men reicaulam nullam aliam deprehendo, quam Methodum
nalycicam Cemper a Philosophis obserratam, qui tamen si
Syntherice fuissent progressi, Facile hosconcludendi modos
invenissent.
O. XIV. Syllogismum ergo quatuor terminis es quatuor
Propositionibus constare (5 posse E5 sape debere, itatamen ut nec
Sorites (itnec Epichirema, de quo vid. Lart. de Penser Part. III.
Cap. XV. _ Aristot. in TOp. lib. VII. C ap. XLI. N. 16. item Ouin-
tIl. Lib. V. Cap. X. alserimus eead oculum quoque demonstra-
mus. Omnis Provositio duabus constat terminis Subjectoe5 Prae-
dicato, ex alterutro dum assumitur novus terminus, e5 cum Medio
suo copulatur, deinceps cum termino non-medio conjuritur; nasci-
num. At si ex utroque Majoris termino, Subjecto videricet (5
Praedicato, novum assumas, utrumque cum suo medio conjuncas,
Es tandem utrum que novum inter se connectas, nece ssario inde re-
sutta