# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0044
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799210226:0044?run=74
# Title: Disputatio Philosophica De Novis Ratiocinandi Adminiculis (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 1; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799210226:0044
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799210226&page=44
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799210226/jpgs/default/00000044.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 36 lines, status machine
# Lines: 36 recognised, mean confidence 0.92
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

5. IX. Ouantum vero ad Analysin Peu fudicium reri de
Falsi, e hic nullo modo poceritribihaerere aqua, si C ap. no-
Stri secundi ductum amplecti relis; Sic enim Primo conside.
randa Conclusio, quam aliquis elicuit, Secundo probatio seu
Proxolitio, unde illam eduxie; Tertio conterenda hae dux
Propolitiones a videndum, on duonori in Conclusione adsint
termini, anunustantum. Videndum Ouarto, an Probario
Cc Propolicio Univertalis AArmans an Negans, an Particularis.
Actirmans, eetandem an Particularis Negans. Ouinto, an no-
vus Conclusionis terminus sic petitus ex Subjecto, an ex Praedi-
Cato, an exhujus Oppolico, desi duo novilint, adeoque exsubje.
etolimul de Pradicato petiri, quo ordine in Conclutione exci-
Piant. Jam Cierobatio sic Universalis AArmans, judicium in-
Stirue sccundum Schema primum; sin Univerlalis Negans ad
secundum Schema exaimina, lin particularis AFirmans ad P’er-
eium, sin particularis Negans ad Ovartum. Sic catim appare
bit, an recte ab altero tuerit conclusum.
S. X. Utautem scias, ad quem hajus vol illius Schematis
numerum aligra Probatio pertincat, illud praecipue cognosci
debet, dequo Num. 5. diximus, unde nempe novus terminus st
pesitus. Id vero lic optime cognolcitur, si ratiocinatiotribus
censtet terminis, notandum, quod in Conclusione repetatur ali-
quis terminus, qui extat quoque in Probatione, hic sane nec Me-
dius erit nec Novus: Restent autem deoadhuc necesse cA,
qrorum ille, qui Probationem ingreditur Medius, ille vero, qui
Conclutionem Novus erit. Id quod ctiam ralet de ratiocina-
tione gratuor terminorum, Medii nempe semper erunt in
Probatione Nori in Conlutione: ex quo Mediorum aliquis NovO-
rum provenerit, rix accurate detinire poterimus, sed hoc ju-
dicio cujusris relinquendum, aut primotentandum an servato
ordine ex priore Medio prior Norus ex posteriore posterior
fuesit elicitus; quod sinon lit, ordo inversus line dubio crit re-
rus: Saepecum uterque ordo procedie, diverla quogre Con-
ClU-
1
10