# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799215783:0008
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799215783:0008?run=74
# Title: Dissertatio Logica De Suppositione (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 3; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799215783:0008
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799215783&page=8
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799215783/jpgs/default/00000008.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 47 lines, status machine
# Lines: 47 recognised, mean confidence 0.86
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

dit, jure an injuriâ haec cum illa voce sitrel conjuneta vel ab cadem
disjuneta.
5. 2. Necellaria (c. est, tum ad exprimendos conceptus pro-
prios, cum ad incellisendos alienos. Gremadmodum enim Mer-
cacor, haromata haberet renalia, _ oculiferiorum loco nihil ex
poneret, nihihederam; e le Falleret _ ementes; se quidem, quod
Epse merces luas per certa et nota ligna exponcreisnoraret; emen.
tes vero, qrod iplifortasse vinum vellent eoin locoemere, ubi
nullum: Iea e Philolophus, qui suippolicionis doctrinam non in
promptuhabet, e se Fallet lapillime, e alios. Adhibebit enim vo-
ces, e in ca qridem Bsmticatione, quae vel parum, vel plane
non gradrant.
5. 3. Undenescio, an quicqram contra Sophisticos insultus
masisnos munire pollit, quam accurata nominum ec corunde Sup.
politionis cognitio. Wreniadmodum enim qrinobilem Gramma-
tices pariter acq; Losices doctrinam ienorant, nec iis uti, nec uten
tes intellisere, Facillime tamen eo ipso circumreniri X prortus con-
tundipoltunt: Ita reor orouaror Ins duvapEcoS aneregt; e qrine-
Sciunt, pro qrorox in utraq; oratione accipiatur, noc ipsi mentem
Tuam exprimere, nec alterius conceptum asseqri poterunt, ac tacilli
me circumrenientur,
5. 4. Sub his latibulis enim insidiantur nobis illi plerumqu
veritatis pexdunculis id qrod diserte, ipse Philo(ophorum Princeps
Pristoreles tectatur L. 1. Soph. Flench. c. 2. Qrando latibulum istud
nominum vocat, grali eine bequeme uno gemeine Chrubesubihomi-
nes Frustra habent Sophistx.
5. 5. Ft Reri Canenon potest, ut res iplasferentes et discursui
absq; tienis e rocibusimmilcentes, disputemus, proinde nomini
busprorebusutamur ceu signis, quae Philolophi cst sententia. Uta-
mur autem non abutamur. Abusus oritur ex Suppolitionis iono.
rantia, usus ex accurat â ejus e cognitione de applicatione. Unde
Seqritur cam esse necesariam..
5. 6. Necessitas vero illa tum demum recte percipi porest, _
Sophimata ob oculos constituantur, ad quae vel nihil vel mi-
Terrime responturus sic ille, qri in hac doctrinâ est hospos. F. Xem-
plum csto hoc:
Qda
pa
de
de
ce
inE
mit
cil
bri
Hiot
s