# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0017
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0017?run=74
# Title: De Opinione Disputationem (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 5; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799266787:0017
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799266787&page=17
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799266787/jpgs/default/00000017.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 52 lines, status machine
# Lines: 52 recognised, mean confidence 0.83
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

111.
1a11
1eYI
cel
5
p
MI
CM.
et
il
reM
14
I1d
1150
pi
estiusmodirocem venamur, quae et priori sc magisperspicua, et
polteriori masiscompendiola, adeoque in locum Existimationis e
actus intellectus decerminari rocabulum assensus substituimus.
5. 24. Perrinet aure essen sus, uei nocuprimario ad secundam men-
tis opcracionem, cstq; judiciu incellectus, quo guxinre composi.
ca auc dirisa Cunc, incer se componit aut diridit, sire compolica aue
dirita ese coenolcicidq; cu decerminatione lui ad alcera conrra-
dictionis parte. EF quia componereh. L. CsaFhrmarcalceru de altero,
dividere aure alteru de alteronesare; assen sus Formalirer erir actus
incellectus quo alterum de altero attirmamus, aue nesamus, auF
quo alterum alteri conrenire aut non convenire judicamus. Un-
decollisimusopinionenon q. este riplam simplicium apprehen-
tionem, prxsupponereramen candem, cum qua in objccto com
volica aut dirila lunc, judicium dignolcere nequeat, sinc coru, que
compolica aur dirila dicuntur, apprehensione. Nec essc 2. cogni-
cioneralem, qua propolitiones aliquis inceoras, Ped sine determi-
natione cognolcit, quomodor. s. iplamysteriatidciinhideles eri-
am quieanon credur, expredicarione rerbicoenolcunt, quamris
enim objectum sic aliquid complexum, camen cum incellectusu-
nionem pradicari cum subjecto simplicirer cognolcar, sine deter-
minatione lui ad alterurram contradiccionis parrem, cognicio
haecproprie loquendo non estiudicium, sed simplexunionis ap.
prehientio. Judicium enim non consistie in qualibet coenitionc
unionis inter predicatum ee subjectum sed in cognitioneejus cum
decerminatione Intellectus ad alterutra contradictionis parrem.
Dud dere incer alios rideatur Mendoza d. 7. de (2. S. 2, 8. 5. (5 fe44.
APFIOR. III.
Caula Efficiens Opinionis est duplex: Phylica e MTo-
ralis. Phylica estincellectus, Moralis Voluntas.
5. 25. Opinionem a causis tuis oriri ut manitestum praeluppo-
no. Ouiaverdisrem scire dicitur, qui caulas ejus novit, ideo
necrectius opinionem porerimus cognolcere quam linuncpor-
ro in iphus caulas inquiramus. Ab Efsicieno aurem meritoini-
tium fecimus, e Incellectum, phylicam, Voluncatem moralem esse
recte diximus. Deincellectu equidem res saris clara, nec Opus, ut
Pluribus probetur, cum enim opiniosir quidam aNen(uS, PrOEF.
ficien-