# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0022
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0022?run=74
# Title: De Opinione Disputationem (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 5; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799266787:0022
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799266787&page=22
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799266787/jpgs/default/00000022.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.93
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

5. 33. Fchaec de opinionis objecto materialiperse, succedicob.
jectum ejus mareriale per accidens, quo d est proposirio necessaria, uEVE
enim proposicionecesaria ex se ee sua naruts ad scienciam proprie
(pectee, tamen ex parce incellectus nostri ad opinionem quoque re-
duci potest. Accidicautem duobus modis urproposicio necesa-
ria opinionis objectum quoad nostiar, E. si intellectus atrin
sac simplicirer connexionem ejus, nec simul atrendar an ilta con-
nexiohcnecestaria an vero contingens. (2) Si nexum ejus in se
necellarium e estentialem, ut continsentem ec accidentalem per
medium probabile apprehendat. Racio hujusrei est, quod scien-
tianecessitare exigas, e inre ipsa qua lcitur, sin intellectu scien-
tis, Kisitur aliqua propositio in se quidem sic necellaria, noc ta-
men necessariam connexionem praedicari cum subjecto intelle-
cus penerrer, cum cerre non scientia led opinionis actum termi-
nabic. Unde simul pacer: Scienciam e Opinionem circa idem
objectum macerialiter sed non formalirer verlari posse, quia qui
rem Ccir, noric hoc eenrialiter _ neceltario competererei, qui
vero oxinacur, putaerel simplicicer, hoc es, praescindendo ane-
Cessitare ac continsentia,, relaccidencaliter e contingenter eidem
comperere c. 8. Circahanc Proposicionemhomo estanimal. (ci-
entia e opinio materialiter verlari pollunt, sed sciencia staruie
esencialem acnecessarium nexum inter hominem sc animal, 0.
pinio verorel simplicem duntaxac, vel accidentalem de contin-
sentem. Maxima isitur est differentia inter utramque obnexum
contrarium prxedicari e subjecti, quam utraque statuit. Qud de
rePhilosophius ex protessocgit l. r post. anal. c. pen. cui loco pluri-
mum lucisaccenditExceII. Sluter. in prael. cit. nec non Zabarella in
Comm. L0G. p. M. 1027. 63c.
APTIOR. V.
Objectum Formale Opinionis est medium proba-
bile. Inhoc objecto duo prxprimis spectanda veniune, T. Pro-
priecates. 2. Munus iplius. Proprictares ejus lune ODlcuricas
aeque lncerticudo. Munus aurem in eo consistie, ue cum Con
curlu rolunearis incellect ad assenturi oxinarivum moveatu
5. 34. Objecto maceriali opinionis perlustrato, consequens
et ur iplius etiam formale objectum speculemur, ad quod mare.
riale