# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0034
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0034?run=74
# Title: De Opinione Disputationem (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 5; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799266787:0034
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799266787&page=34
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799266787/jpgs/default/00000034.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 37 lines, status machine
# Lines: 37 recognised, mean confidence 0.94
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

quae Levi. Craris autem sre pragnans RatiorocatuF, quae tanti
ponderis est, uc in eo prudens quisque polsienici sinculla leritatis
autimprudenciaenota. Atleris se Frirola Racio eAt, cui sine re-
mericatis nota, nemo prudens fidere potest ad luum exhibendum
judicium, eciam hi Cufficiens sic ad illudelicien dum physice, cemere
ac imprudenter. Graritas isitur atque Lericas Fundamentorum
seuassentiendi mediorum in caula Cunt, quare opinio quaedam
probabilis quaedam improbabilis esse dicatur. Quodnam vero
Medium reputandum sic grare acque adeo (utliciens, ut opinio il.
10 Tubnixaprobabilishrabeatur: Icem; Oux opinio probabilior
centeri, aliisque praeterri debeat: prolixe juxtim ac scite ostendie
I2gnierdo in pharo scient. p. 1. d. 7. 9. 2. (53.
5. 52. Deniqueratione subjecti e hnis in speculativam e Practi-
cam distinsuitur. Speculauva CA qux intellectuitheoretico intra-
rec, e ultimate incoenitione sctitur, qualis opinio est qua sta-
tuo; caelum esse corraptibile. Practica, quae in incellectu practico
reperitur. ee ulterius ad actionem relhonestam vel curpem desti.
natur. Talisopiniopraccica ett; qua felicitatem saam in diviriis
constituit Avarus, aut in Polupracibus Favenis, aut inhonoribus Am.
biriosus. Dux quidem distinctio maximum ulum habet in rebus
moralibus, ubi trequenter Autores appellare (olene opiniones ali.
quaspeculacirerantum probabiles, quas tamen ad praxin do.
cent minime deducendas esse, cum practice improbabiles esse
aurminuscuex rideaneur. Duo nomine mulei Jurisperici apra.
xirelesant opiniones Duareni, Cujacii, Donelli, Antonii Fabri, et
aliorum, quos tamen cheorice probabiles imo verissimas arbi.
Erantur. Ratiohujus rei est. quod actus humani, quos appro.
banc dictae opiniones, ita lune comparaci, uc si quidem secundum
sespectentur licici sint arquehonesti, ( tamen executioni manda-
ri debeanc. moraliter tierinonpossinc, quin iis alii actus illiciu
intermisecantur aur ibsimet deprarentur aliqua circumstancia.
S. 53. Acque haec de opinionis dirisionibus accidentalibus
quarum unaqueque in caereras est ducibilis) dixisse Cufhciane.
Redco nunc ad Diritionem esentialem, cujus membris acciden
calestres priores nullonegorio applicari porunt. UEvero Cu-
justiberassensus specitica distinctio ex objecto Formali seu allen.
ciend