# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0037
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/799266787:0037?run=74
# Title: De Opinione Disputationem (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 5; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio - , page id 799266787:0037
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=799266787&page=37
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/799266787/jpgs/default/00000037.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 66 lines, status machine
# Lines: 66 recognised, mean confidence 0.82
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

M1D
COn.
tem.
rmin
ap.
roba.
ilioni
IIIeL
M e
Onent
O1.
eac
d
A
CCie.
qu
1MIB
Sed
la
ietiu
(O ME
nusilt
CoI
Ol
11S.IID
medl
licilet
est
vegoras nai un avarnaias. Tlanc definitionem cacim relolvo
ingenus acque differenciam. Cenus est onnis seu Existimatio,
quorocabulonil aliudhicsigniticatur quam assentus opinacivus
(opinionisroce generaliter Pumca) qui quid sirjam erolutum est
CaP. ancecedenci. D fferentia delumitur ab objecto materiali, nempe
Propolitione nonnecellarid imediaca; cninos adjiciemus Formale,
hroconim estRatio, Cub qua objectimateriale cognoscamus, uri le-
piusmonitum.
eAPTIOR. XI.
Opinionis Immedinca objectum mareriale est Propositio
nonnecellaria scu contingensimmediatu; Objectum Formale
Probabilicasconnexionis immediara cerminorum.
5. 59. Duemadmodum interpropoliciones necectarias e csen-
tialestroc dacurdiscrimen, quod alixe sincprimae e immediatae, quX
nulla aliapropolicione prioriprobari pollune, acque ideo prima
principia(cientiarum rocantur; alixe veromediacae quae per alias
propositiones prioresprobantur, e proinde conclusiones dicun.
cur; Pari quoque modopropolitiones contingenres seu opinabi-
les in Mediatas H. C. Conclusiones, ee immediatas H. c. principiao.
pinabilia distinsui debent. Ouond conclusionesres laris certa.
Guodrero dencur eciam prima principia opinabilia, ad qux reduca-
tur conclutiones opinabiles, exindepacescit; Juod una propos.
tio opinabilisprobetur per aliam; cum autem in infinitum hoc
heri nonpossic, ideo necesse est, uc dereniamuscandem adpri-
mami ex immediacum propolitionem opinabilem. Ucenim in pro-
politionibusnecellariis d mediaris transire possumus ad imme-
diacas, Ecetiam a mediaris propolicionibus opinabilibusadim-
mediacas, quia conclusio incerta qualis est opinabilis, non porest
nonreduci ad incerta quoque seu opinabiliaprincipia, nisi relis
incertam cognicione simul esse cerram, quod manit. Ao implicar.
5. 60. Ilis ita praesuppolitis dicimus opinionem perinde aca
que scienciam esse conclusionum ac primorum principiorum. Si
cur enim (cientia demonstrabilis, quae nar éEoxi scientia appella-
eur, circa conclusiones necessarias est occupaca, ita opinio discursiva
Ceumediaca, qua isti sciencix respondet, circa conclusiones opinabi-
les veclatur, ur postea in Aphor. Ceg. trademus. Pc licur Scientia in-
demonstrabilis, alias incellisentia dicta, pro objecto materiali a
BnO.