# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/800313062:0097
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/800313062:0097?run=74
# Title: [Rudimenta Logicae Ebraeorum] Rvdimenta Logicae Ebraeorvm (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 42, Stück 7; ZEN Leibn. Marg. 42)
# Folio 89, page id 800313062:0097
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=800313062&page=97
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/800313062/jpgs/default/00000097.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.89
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

M
iI
1
C.
ete (89.)
mebantur serricute quam serri hac in parte, quod (lo-
quor nunc ex sententia Paschi) servi Cananai ob viola
cum aliquod principale membrum servitio dimicteban.
tur ante exactos sex serritutis annos, ancilla aurem ideo
non dimitrebantur, sed data pro ratione damni pecunia
in Territute retinebantur. Accedit non leve serritutis
incommodum, quod Dominusjus habebat, ancillam et-
iam inritam desponlandi, in serrum autem idem jusDo.
mino non compecebat, cui s extra matrimonium per-
manere libuit, licuit. Unde eridens est, specialem i
ctam ancilla commemorationem partim lenius, partim
Srarius quid interre, quam in genere serricuris onus COn.
Cticucum erat. Addo aliud exemplum ex Levit. XIII, 3.
si fuerit pilus in plaga leprae conversus in album, im-
mundum eum pronunciet Cacerdos, quod sane in unirer.
cum de omni pilo cutis dictum cA; at v, 29. _ 30. exci
picur pilus capiris de barbxe, his verbis: cum fuerit in
viro aut muliere placa leprae in capite aut barba, tun
aspiciet sacerdos placam, cumque aspectum ejus profun-
diorem cute, pilumque in ea deprehenderit pavum es sub
tilem, immundum pronunciet eum. Igitur non judica-
tur leprae signum esse, si pilus capitis vel barbae (ic albus,
sic enim senes Facile pro leprolis haberentur, se d in ca-
Dite e barba pili Aari de tenues sint oportet, si lepram
inde altimare conveniat. Minuit igitur haec exceptio,
quoniam generali pracepto detrahit, nec semper ex can.
dore pilorum lepram aestimat. Auget autem, quoni
am generali de indiciis lepra pracepto addic de hoc, si
Dili Aari ee cenues deprehendantur.
Duid tandem Aac, si speciei excepta aliud attribua.
cur praedicatum, ob peculiarem mutationem, qua specici
acciderie, ex unico intelligemus canOne:
ede