# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/818663391:0147
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/818663391:0147?run=74
# Title: Antonii Reiseri Augustani, De Origine, Progressu Et Incremento Antitheismi, Seu Atheismi, Epistolaris Dissertatio (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 72, Stück 2; Leibn. Marg. 72)
# Folio 143, page id 818663391:0147
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=818663391&page=147
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/818663391/jpgs/default/00000147.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 65 lines, status machine
# Lines: 65 recognised, mean confidence 0.83
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

1155FI
IIIIpCcCAI
11.0ob
naxiiHUI
10r, quin et
NCUIM COII
10c. 1d Mi
um cum alic
QuatVisNO
18 quidem l
61d
encia (Olim HII
Deum, debicu
MaXIMECON
quaevisesresit
iminaris
fi 111
Tacrinet Patis
1ID CjuSce in
INTIAS IIAISI
Cclum i SsinC
xistec, nitrilal
amplius videet
nucacs ab illo
AIIOrO, SCNCX
1
118 140lOrUM C
am nOn dicat
ndabilicee at
BEAMCUEICCEM
BUSCOMPATOH
inciam _ ut
apoctaia1
DE APH E TSHO.
esse indubium sic. P. quidem, nequehic de-
Fuere, qui defensionem Idololarria Salomo-
niS Schersticae in Ce Culciperene, nominacim
incer alios Zulanus, celebris ille Apoctata,
Idolianus a Gregorio Nazianzeno quon-
dam dictus, de quo Crrillus Alexandrinus lib. 7. Cox.
celtacur, quod de Salomonis idololacria 2. Sa
EVCTIE, FUM si codq 2S pavect aula Cd c_ d. per. Toms
daonanta perluatum caeteros eriam De05 c0. 6. p. 224.
Imse. Cui Crrillus illud in specic respon (IC5 seq9.
loco dedic: DE) monun eum non defecisse
C in omne vitum ruisse, vel hine facilé pare-
bit, quod eam obrem Deus vehementer con-
citatus est, ac statum sceleri indixit poenam.
Onia rero sulianus ad contirmandum id.
quod de DP linformarione e ad colen-
dum exceros quoque Deos impullu dixe-
rat, ne DELillusor rideretur, addidic: In-
vidia s amulatio, ne ad bonos quidem ho-
mines pertinet, cantum abest; ut in Ancelos
ant Deoscadar. Elinc Cyrillus opcime re-
Potui: Ne dicac, suis undique sermonibusfi-
dem quaerens, invidiam es amulationem mi-
nime ad bonos pertinere viros; nedum ad
Deose Ancelos. Non ea erat, o bone, imo
pestimehominum invidia. Dui aurem?
Duope opus invidia non esse contendimus,
quod diona e immortalis mens non ferat
errantes, s qui nescio, quo pacto? divinos
hono
243