# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/826603459:0517
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/826603459:0517?run=74
# Title: Qua Continentur, Oratio Inauguralis. Mathesis Universalis; sive, Arithmeticum opus Integrum, tum Numerosam Arithmeticam tum Speciosam complectens. Adversus Meibomii, de Proportionibus Dialogum, Tractatus Elencticus (shelfmarks Leibn. Marg. 84:1, Stück 1; Leibn. Marg. 84:1)
# Folio 21, page id 826603459:0517
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=826603459&page=517
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/826603459/jpgs/default/00000517.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 41 lines, status machine
# Lines: 41 recognised, mean confidence 0.90
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

De Proportionibus Dialoeum.
Scd, ne difficiles simus; Pgo quidem concedo, quod isle (ne
Fallor) hic concendic, (quod falrem concend. x. debets) nem-
DE, ixixor; e runnoinra, vel de quancitare concinua dici; vel
Talcem de co quod adinttar concinux quancitaris consideratur:
Scilicet, ubi quid considerarux VE Duantum, nON UC QueI. (Sed
_ uez edos eadem, creco, lacieudine lumenduierie: Nam qua
de magnieudinibus hric habet Fuclides Propotitiones, non Tolis
Propric dictis magnicudinibus, sed eciam aliis nOn rarO uan-
eis appliCANEUE.) AC quid DOrEOS
Tam, inquic. P28. 83. videamas quomodo in rationis definitione
hoc vocabuli locum habet: RemPC Xo7 C 65I Mo urEdCor duoZErCoV n X
BANAINSTHTA WCIS aMnNa O1 gesiS.
Ouod nobishac in re vidcacur, superius dictum est; nempec.
am hic innui habicudinem qualicaciram, qux sic ex quancicare
oriundas sire qua magnicudinibus compecie non eam lecun-
dum quod mulia Cune, vel eriam simplicicer maena, _C. quam
secundum quod Duanta, tire Duam maena, Lint. Videamus quid
alii.
Scholiastes (inquit P. 84.) hac voce, infinitas magniiudines ex-
elusas esse DITaF. L’ortasse quidem. Neque male. Nam muxinor,
quam maenum, non simplicicer maenum dicie, led magni determina.
tam maeniiudinem, Cive maeniimdinis mensuram; quipue de infinicis
non dicipocest mnira, quam magna (nc: adeoque nec illis
accribuenda gesi5, i XX mixinomra, quae ipsis lecundum nMX EKOTH
Conreniar. (Scholiattis verba habentur pas. 10. l. 21. 2d 3, 7
anxxomra, inquic, in Racionis definicione additur, tra Zoenon
 a rclecor uerEdr:) Onem aucem hic exercec Meibomius, cri-
cicilmus, P84. l. 27. in eo craviter peccasse Scholiasten, quod has vo-
ces, X mxinom ra, cum maeniiudinum norione conjuncendas purat, cum
Fuclides ipse relationis notioni illas adinnverat; quod articulus n in
Graeca Editione indicat: mihi quidem nullius momencividetur.
N.g. enim Scholiastes ita separac; quin arriculus n’relpiciae
vocem geors: Cnempeca relacio quae eAt secundum quancica-
cem;) neque Poclides ita conjuneie cum nocione relacionis
quin vox mainemra maenicudines respiciac. Non enim incelsio
eendum eAt, n rara 5 georas ruxnomn, quod videtur velle
Meibomius. (quati dixisser Fuclides, Magnitudinum relario ea
quae relationis quantitatem spectat.) ecquis enim hic Centus escct
Ced i nar  avs AEZEdCOD MAINOTNTa; nmDe, ea maenitudi
noiB