# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/851385079:0290
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/851385079:0290?run=74
# Title: [Idea Totius Encyclopaediae Mathematico-Philosoph. hoc est, Analysis Aristotelico-Euclidea] Erhardi Weigelii, Prof. Publ. Idea Totius Encyclopædiæ Mathematico-Philosoph. hoc est, Analysis Aristotelico-Euclidea (shelfmark Leibn. Marg. 106)
# Folio 278, page id 851385079:0290
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=851385079&page=290
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/851385079/jpgs/default/00000290.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 43 lines, status machine
# Lines: 43 recognised, mean confidence 0.88
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

278
De Mlechodo Doctrina.
dectos.
Pensum, usque dum cotam disciplinam absolverimus, poctu.
Non contra laremus; perinde ac si quisdonium exstructurusrectum pri
iscomponat, et possessori una cum spectacoribus tanquam
fuleris imponatintere a ustinendum; donec parieres substi-
cuat ab aliisporroneruant in sublimicam diucenendos, u-
Guedum Fundamencum Araris in cerram lapidibus jaciac,
cuirocastructura incumbat. Sune Herculerobustioreso-
porreret esse bajulos qui eantum onus tam diu sustinere
DOsenE.
Nis abu (
5. 30. Ouod Arero quis sub Disciplina rocabulonudas
sumatur complectacur Deiniciones a terminorum distinctiones (cu-
Disciplina cullosracuos) _ sinem pro principiato; media rero pro prin-
cipiiehabeat: nemo Analrcicorum irascecur, si finis detini-
eionem (cucullum archecrpum) prioriloco, mediorum de A-
niciones (cucullos ectrpos) posteriori loco exhibeat, argue
ita a principiacis ad principia(d cucullis postpradicamenta-
libus ad cucullos antcpraedicamentales) progredisibiridea-
Nethodus cur. Incerim haec disciplina (verius cucullorum eaberna)
analycica, non magis analzeic a methodo eradicarere dicitur ex mence
Machemaricorum e Aristocelis, quamille, qui DeS- Fra(-
mum aliquando liceras ad amicum calamo detruncaco, ilcd
immiso desuper ligneo serlo, Scribereridie, calamis TuiSo.
mnibusica praparacis, Scylo Frasmico (uc sibi ridebacur)
Tuasoracionesimitando con(eripHE.
onjo renui
5. 31. Fst enim Analyrica methodus apud Aristorelem
num obie ria Ella, quarerum propolicarum (non terminorum) habiendo
robess
neceMaria (non definitio norionalis) ex fuis causis necessariis
(non ex conceptibilitaribus es notionibus logicis) eruca indubita-
eocornoscenda sistitur in Scieneiis (non nude apprehendenda
Jumitur in lexicis) Cicutara donncs contirmare nihil aliud eA,
quam demonstrare, uc passim loquicur Aristoreles. Ouod
cum alicer Rerinec possit nec solcar in incesris dilciplinis.
quam a principiis ad principiaca progrediendo, sacile qui
ris incelligie Analpcicam mechodum, E secundum Aristore
lem loquamur, in inceoris disciplinis, ipsam ene quam rulso
ccun
EUm ES