# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-613556:0012
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-613556:0012?run=74
# Title: LBr. 722 · Pfaff
# Folio 6v, page id DE-611-HS-613556:0012
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 10r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-613556&page=12
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-613556/jpgs/default/00000012.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 38 lines, status machine
# Lines: 38 recognised, mean confidence 0.89
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

quam quo quis expectaret. Ostendendum
ntu irverat soilicet, me praecentiar tealem tollere,
II:rei me Scripturam hactem et Petesono
olis collo trahere in partes. Sed verba Jua sic
habent: multa sunt quae hanc praesentiae
2 tealis explicationem difficilem reddunt.
mirad si explicare volui, certe tollere non volui.
inDues me sastuliise per consequentiam ea
oure isgr statuendo, quibus tollitur. Sed de eo mox
+. videbimus; quanquam haec quoque distingui
ux praestabat Miti explicare mysterium in
ni animo plane non fuit. Luin potius expli-
Eicatione prudentius abstinen judicati.
Volui tantiem illusttar analopa quadam
in quo
quod nemo equas re bene considerata ne
b reprelendet; non magis quam veleres,
que unionem naturaram in Christo com-
unionis
patatione, inter animam et corpus, aut
ctassius etiam, ferri igniti aut vitri a
c
lumine penetrati explicuere. Sed pergis
I. Actio immediata in distans negatur.
nempe secundum communem natura
cursum. At Deo autem effici posse, ut
eteaturae agant in remota, nescio an
u neges; alii certe Philorophi vel Theclogi
quod seiam non negant. Tergis porroll.
ab Actione in distans ad praesentiam
corporum a se invicem distantium non
valet consequentia. Recte, et quomodo
inposset valere consequentia affirmativa
ab uno opposito ad alterun. Certe si actio
est in distans, utique est inter ea quae sibi
t
un 
e