# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-861255:0042
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-861255:0042?run=74
# Title: LBr. 705 · Overbeck
# Folio 21v, page id DE-611-HS-861255:0042
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 22r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-861255&page=42
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-861255/jpgs/default/00000042.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 59 lines, status machine
# Lines: 59 recognised, mean confidence 0.91
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

Ex his video erui posse multa quae totam Analysiu
perficerent si movo satis essem ab ingenio instructus ad
ea rimanda. Ea igitur qua vitendi de Analysi Dgaduo
dicenda quoque videntur de Decadica ut non minus hic
urgere oporteat Locum 44. vel 58.
Locg 5. dat 3984. Ejus Quadratum 15872256600 divisu
dat Residuum 211I pro Loco 11. Ejus Quadratum
4456321 similiter divisum dat. Residuum 3579 pro Loco
22). Ejus Quadratum 12809241 similiter divisum
dat Residuum 3107 pro Loco (44) Hbugus
Qvadratum 9653449 similiter divisum, dut Residuum
pro Loco
3841. Ergo adhuc parum spei niso loco 176 vel
352 melior luxoriatur
evadratum ex 384c est 14753281 Ejus Resiouum
est 2823 pr0 Loco 176
Ejus Quadr. 7969329
Ibi demumResiduum Unitatis se prodit, atque achus
salva res est pro Loco 352
Nam continuad
erit Loco 704 etia Unitas ut a Lous 1408, 2816
5632. Huic si addas 352 etira Unitas Residuum enis
pro Loco 5984. quod erat desideratum. Valet
ergo totum non secus in Decadica quam in
dgadica Analysi. desi una Analysis Residuam
Unitatem citius ex hibeat.
Omnium horum autem Demonstratio adhuc
ignoratar.
Vidi quoque in Dgacica Analysi si quovis
sub Exronente sit Residuum +1. sab Expone
te dimidio sem per dari Radicem ejus +1 vel:
At in Decadica Analysi oltud non sem per suc,
cedit in Numeris ompositis Nam Locus 257
dedit Residuum +1. sed dimidius 176. longe aliam
habuit Radicem scil 3823, qua tamen Radix ad Cgilui
6001. omnino etia Racix Unitatis habenda est, quia
quadratum ejus demto 6001 quoties potest, aequatur
Unitati. Quo parto + 1. adhuc alias Radices
in Cyilo Composito agnoscet qua +1. vel - 2, cum
in Cyclo primitivo alias Radices non agnoscat
Doceri itaque optem annon detur Methodus, aliquid
G
certi de Radicibus Residui dabi statuendi, foret enim
regressus multo perfectior non modo per dimidiationes
seo etiam per subtriplationes subquintaplationes et
in Analysi Numeri dati. Ita si 6001. esset primus
Loco 6000 oporteret esse Residuum Unitatis. Ergus si Ra
dicem surctesolidam nossem, statim ad Locum 1200
calculum ceprimere  sic porro. Imo plura alia se pau
derent, si tam expeditus duretur transitus ad subm ultiplicia
qua ad multiplicia. Si enim semel novi
dato loco 35Z
Lasse Resionum Unitatis consequens statim erit Loco quovis qui
spiesius 352 mulliplex iterum Residuum esse unitateum
i2
i
de
B
18