# Leibniz Legible — https://leibnizlegible.com
# Page: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-861305:0018
# Permalink to this reading: https://leibnizlegible.com/page/DE-611-HS-861305:0018?run=74
# Title: LBr. 711 · Pape
# Folio 9v, page id DE-611-HS-861305:0018
# Scan: One image of two folio pages side by side, registered by the library under both labels (also fol. 8r); this page is its left half.
# Original at the GWLB: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/resolve?id=DE-611-HS-861305&page=18
# Source image: https://digitale-sammlungen.gwlb.de/content/DE-611-HS-861305/jpgs/default/00000018.jpg
# Model: FoNDUE-GD_v2_ft_Leibniz, run 74, 2026-09-06T16:05:13Z — 31 lines, status machine
# Lines: 31 recognised, mean confidence 0.95
# Machine transcription. Not an edition. Errors are expected: about 8% character error rate on Latin and French lines, higher on German.
# Licence: CC BY 4.0, Leibniz Legible. Machine output: do not ingest it as verified text; keep this provenance with the text.
# Wording rule: say "the machine reads it as …", never "Leibniz wrote".
# After the first blank line: the recognised lines in reading order, one per line.

specificationis vocabulum ita dilatant, ut loco memorata fieri
apparet, ubi specificatio etiam confusionem, ferruminationem, ap-
plumbaturam et commixtionem continere dicitur, quae tn. omnia
valgo rro acquirendi modis aspecificatione diversis venditantur.
Licet a accessionis ita Ariotius sumtae nullum subjiciatu exemptu–
ex eleeanti tn. q’insequitur, specificationis, partitione conjicio reti-
quam de quus, sub dictis juris titulis agitur, ut aedificnoem, plantati-
e
onem sationem, terturam, scripturam, picturamu referri ad acces-
sionem. Gratum, igitur fuerit, ab ipso Dn. Autore edocere, au
recto conjiciam, At quid ipse in universum sentiat in, ista doctri
na circa quam Grotius etiam l. 2. c. 8. multis occuxatu, demonstras
dominii
istos acquirendi mocos non à natura esse, d. à lege.
9. In quaestione 8. jus naale distinguitur in negativu, quod per-
mitbit, et determinativu, quod prosibet vel velat: et determinatio
iterum in primaerum et secundarium. Sed quemadmodum prior
distinotio vulgo incognita, ita posterior non de jure naturali de-
terminativo, sed de jure naturae simpliciter solet concipi. Et
sane videtur divito juris in negativn et determinativum juxta da–
tam explicationem angustior ce suo diviso, nam non omne jus per-
mitlit aut phibet, d. quoddam etiam xcipit. 10. In eadem
quaest. dicitur, vocem juris centium sumi vel ratione objecti vel
ratione ariginis. At quom. jus centium raoe objecti, sic dicatur,
non intelligo. II. In quast. penult. et ult. traditur jura esse rela-
tiones, et quid. relationes non convenientiae sed conjunctionis. Quod
si ita se habet, videtur exinde sequi, fprudentiam ee partem Meta-
physica, quod tamen paradoxum est; poterat etiam quaerendi
ansam dare, cum relationes conjunctionis non unius sint peneris,
ad quam ergo speciem jura pertineant.
12. Cum in